Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 59, Issue 4 , Pages 377-380, April 2001

Patient's perception of the facial appearance after maxillomandibular advancement for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

Received from the Stanford University Sleep Disorders and Research Center, Stanford, CA. *Clinical Assistant Professor and Associate Director of Sleep Surgery. †Clinical Associate Professor and Director of Sleep Surgery. ‡Clinical Professor and Co-Director of Sleep Disorders Clinic. §Professor

Abstract 

Purpose: The goal of this study was to evaluate the patient's perception of the facial appearance after maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Patients and Methods: During a 14-month period, 58 patients underwent MMA for OSAS. All of the patients underwent preoperative and postoperative cephalometric analysis. Between 6 and 12 months after surgery, a questionnaire was mailed to each patient. The questionnaire asked the patient to evaluate subjectively their postoperative facial appearance. Visual analog scale ([VAS] 0 to 10) was used to assess the extent of the facial changes. Results: Forty-four (76%) patients (39 men, 6 women) responded to the questionnaire. Cephalometric analysis revealed that 40 patients had maxillomandibular protrusion postoperatively. Forty-two (96%) of the 44 patients reported changes in their facial appearance (VAS, 4.8 ± 2.5). Twenty-four (55%) patients reported favorable facial changes (ie, they were more attractive [15 patients] and/or more youthful). Fourteen patients gave neutral responses (ie, they were no more or no less attractive). Four patients gave unfavorable responses (ie, they were less attractive after surgery). Conclusion: The results suggest that most patients who underwent MMA for OSAS noted moderate changes in their facial appearance. Despite significant maxillomandibular protrusion based on the postoperative cephalometric analysis, more than 90% of the patients gave either positive or neutral responses to the changes in their facial appearance. © 2001 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Li: 750 Welch Rd, Suite 317, Palo Alto, CA 94304; e-mail: kaseyli@hotmail.com

PII: S0278-2391(01)54410-9

doi:10.1053/joms.2001.21870

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 59, Issue 4 , Pages 377-380, April 2001