Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 70, Issue 2 , Pages 473-483, February 2012

PET-MRI Fusion in Head-and-Neck Oncology: Current Status and Implications for Hybrid PET/MRI

  • Denys J. Loeffelbein, MD, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Loeffelbein: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, München D-81675, Germany
  • ,
  • Michael Souvatzoglou, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
  • ,
  • Veronika Wankerl, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
  • ,
  • Axel Martinez-Möller, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
  • ,
  • Julia Dinges, MD

      Affiliations

    • Formerly Department of Radiology, Technische Universität München, München, Germany; Currently Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
  • ,
  • Markus Schwaiger, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
  • ,
  • Ambros J. Beer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, München, Germany

published online 23 May 2011.

Purpose

To review the current status and clinical effect of PET-MRI image fusion in the staging of head-and-neck cancer and to show its implications for imaging with future hybrid PET/MRI scanners.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed the current literature in order to provide an overview of the potential of the combination of the anatomic and functional imaging capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and of the potential for molecular and metabolic imaging with Positron emission tomography (PET). The research question was whether these image devices might be of synergistic value.

Results

PET with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose has shown promising results for the assessment of lymph node involvement in cancer, the identification of distant metastasis and synchronous and metachronous tumors, and the evaluation of tumor recurrence or carcinoma of an unknown primary.

For morphologic imaging, MRI has several advantages compared with computed tomography in the head-and-neck area. This is mainly because of the superior soft tissue contrast and fewer artifacts from dental implants. Moreover, MRI allows functional imaging, such as the assessment of perfusion with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. The published data indicate that image fusion should be beneficial in the case of the recurrence of oromaxillofacial cancer and in the evaluation of potential metastatic lymph nodes. However, retrospective image fusion is technically demanding in the head-and-neck area, mainly because of the varied patient positions used for the various scanners and the anatomic complexity of this region.

Conclusions

Combined PET/MRI scanners might overcome the above-named problems. Both sequential and fully integrated PET/MRI scanners are now available in selected departments, and future studies will show whether hybrid PET/MRI is of greater clinical value than PET/CT and retrospective image fusion techniques.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The first two authors contributed equally to this paper.

PII: S0278-2391(11)00392-2

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.120

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 70, Issue 2 , Pages 473-483, February 2012