Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 60, Issue 9 , Pages 1012-1017, September 2002

Effects of age, amount of advancement, and genioplasty on neurosensory disturbance after a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy☆☆

  • Joseph E. Van Sickels, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Director of Residency Education, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
  • ,
  • John P. Hatch, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Departments of Psychiatry and Orthodontics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
  • ,
  • Calogero Dolce, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
  • ,
  • Robert A. Bays, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chief, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • John D. Rugh, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chairman, Department of Orthodontics, The University of Texas, Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.

Abstract 

Purpose: There are numerous risks for developing neurosensory deficits after a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of genioplasty, length of advancement, and age and their interactions in a group of patients undergoing BSSO advancement and followed up for 2 years. Materials and Methods: Patients were examined at multiple time intervals during the 2 years. Measuring in the mental nerve distribution assessed damage. 127 subjects were divided into the following 3 age groups: younger than 24 years, 24 to 35 years, and older than 35 years old. They also were divided into small (≤7 mm) and large (>7 mm) advancements and genioplasty and no genioplasty. Change in tactile sensitivity from presurgical to the subsequent time periods is reported as a function of these variable and interactions among the variables. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Friedman test, all at an α level of 0.05. Results: Older subjects had greater sensory losses than younger subjects. Patients with a genioplasty had a greater loss of sensation initially. For all subjects, the sensory function of those receiving large and small advancements was not significantly different. Among subjects receiving small advancements there was no significant difference among the 3 age groups. However, among patients receiving advancements greater than 7 mm, older patients did worse. Among patients not receiving genioplasty, there was no significant difference among the 3 age groups. In contrast, older subjects with a genioplasty had significantly greater sensory deficits. Conclusions: Age at the time of surgery and addition of a genioplasty increases the risk of a neurosensory injury. Large advancements further increase the risk of injury in older patients. © 2002 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:1012-1017, 2002

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DE 09630 and 07282.

☆☆ Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Van Sickels: Professor and Director of Residency Education, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, D-512 Chandler Medical Center, College of Dentistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0297; e-mail: vansick@pop.uky.edu

PII: S0278-2391(02)00064-2

doi:10.1053/joms.2002.34411

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 60, Issue 9 , Pages 1012-1017, September 2002