Comparison of 3 bone substitutes in canine extraction sites

References 

1. Salata L, Craig G, Brook I. Bone healing following use of hydroxylapatite or ionomeric bone substitutes alone or combined with a guide bone regeneration technique: An animal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:44
   • MEDLINE
2. Kveton J, Friedman CD, Costantino PD, et al.  Indication for hydroxylapatite cement reconstruction in lateral based skull surgery. Am J Otol. 1995;16:456
3. Kamerer D, Hirsch BE, Snyderman CH, et al.  Hydroxylapatite cement: A new method for achieving watertight closure in transtemporal surgery. Am J Otol. 1994;15:47
   • MEDLINE
4. Maniker A, Cantrell S, Valcys C. Failure of hydroxylapatite cement to set in repair of a cranial defect: Case report. Neurosurgery. 1998;43:953
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Sclar AG. Preserving alveolar ridge anatomy following tooth removal in conjunction with delayed implant placement. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 1999;7:39
   • MEDLINE
6. Block MS, Kent JN. A comparison of dense and particulate forms of hydroxylapatite in dog extraction sites. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44:89
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (524 KB)
   • CrossRef
7. Brown GD, Mealey BL, Nummikoski PV, et al.  Hydroxylapatite cement implants for regeneration of periodontal osseous defects in humans. J Periodontol. 1998;69:146
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
8. Berglundh T, Linde J. Healing around implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-Oss: An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:117
   • MEDLINE