Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 61, Issue 12 , Pages 1410-1417 , December 2003

Evaluation of condylar translation by sonography versus axiography in orthognathic surgery patients1

  • Constantin A Landes, MD, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Consultant, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Landes: Klinik für Kiefer- und plastische Gesichtschirurgie, der Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    • ,
  • Marcus Sterz, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Germany

References 

  1. Schendel SA, Epker BN. Results after mandibular advancement surgery (An analysis of 87 cases). J Oral Surg. 1980;38:265
  2. Storum KA, Bell WH. Hypomobility after maxillary and mandibular osteotomies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;57:7
  3. Aragon SB, Van Sickels JE, Dolwick MF, et al.  The effects of orthognathic surgery on mandibular range of motion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985;43:938
  4. Boyd SB, Karas ND, Sinn DP. Recovery of mandibular mobility following orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49:924
  5. Schneider S, Witt E. Funktionelle Befunde vor und nach einer kombiniert kieferorthopädisch-kieferchirurgischen Behandlung von Angle Klasse III-Patienten. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1991;52:51
  6. Zimmer B, Heinrichs E, Kubein-Meesenburg D. Longitudinal changes in the acoustic temporomandibular symptoms due to different procedures of orthognathic surgery. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1991;52:346
  7. Nagamine T, Kobayashi T, Nakajima T, et al.  The effects of surgical—Orthodontic correction of skeletal class III malocclusion on mandibular movement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;51:385
  8. Zimmer B, Kubein-Meesenburg D. A comparison of axiographic tracings before and after orthodontic-oral surgical interventions. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1989;50:301
  9. Jager A, Kubein-Meesenburg D, Luhr HG. Longitudinal study of combined orthodontic and surgical treatment of class II malocclusion with deep overbite. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1991;6:29
  10. Zimmer B, Engelke D, Radlanski RJ, et al.  Changes in opening mobility due to surgical advancement of the mandible. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1991;52:78
  11. Zimmer B, Schwestka R, Kubein-Meesenburg D. Changes in mandibular mobility after different procedures of orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:188
  12. Zimmer B. Temporomandibular joint function after orthognathic surgery—The individual factors. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1993;54:27
  13. Helm J, Stepke MT. Maintenance of the preoperative condyle position in orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1997;25:34
  14. Umstadt HE, Lalyko G, Hochban W, et al.  Function of the temporomandibular joint after mandibular translocation osteotomies with and without positioning plates. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1998;2(suppl):177
  15. Landes C, Walendzik W, Klein C. Sonography of the temporomandibular joint from 60 examinations and comparison with MRI and axiography. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2000;28:352
  16. Zimmer B, Keese E, Kubein-Meesenburg D. Studies on the reliability of axiographic recordings using the SAS system. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z. 1989;44:58
  17. Siegert R. Ultraschallbilddokumentation im Kopf-Halsbereich. Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichts Chir. 1987;11:67
  18. Zimmer B, Jäger A, Kubein-Meesenburg D. Comparison of “normal” TMJ-function in class I, II, and III individuals. Eur J Orthod. 1991;13:27
  19. Westesson PL, Eriksson L, Kurita K. Reliability of negative clinical temporomandibular joint examination (Prevalence of disk displacement in asymptomatic temporomandibular joints). Oral Surg. 1989;68:551
  20. Ribeiro RF, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, et al.  The prevalence of disc displacement in symptomatic and asymptomatic volunteers aged 6 to 25 years. J Orofac Pain. 1997;11:37
  21. Kircos LT, Ortendahl DA, Mark AS, et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the TMJ disk in asymptomatic volunteers. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;45:852
  22. Brady AP, McDevitt L, Stack JP, et al.  A technique for magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint. Clin Radiol. 1993;47:127
  23. Tasaki MM, Westesson PL. Temporomandibular joint (Diagnostic accuracy with sagittal and coronal MR images). Radiology. 1993;186:723
  24. Kaplan PA, Tu HK, Sleder RP, et al.  Inferior joint space arthrography of normal TMJ (Reassessment of diagnostic criteria). Radiology. 1986;159:585
  25. Stefanoff V, Hausamen JE, Berghe P. Ultrasound imaging of the TMJ disk in asymptomatic volunteers. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1992;20:337
  26. Nabeith YB, Speculand B. Ultrasonography as a diagnostic aid in temporomandibular joint dysfunction. A preliminary investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;20:182
  27. Emshoff R, Bertram S, Rudisch A, et al.  The diagnostic value of ultrasonography to determine the temporomandibular joint disk position. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1997;84:688
  28. Hayashi T, Jusuke I, Koyama JI, et al.  The accuracy of sonography for evaluation of internal derangement of the TMJ in asymptomatic elementary school children (Comparison with MR and CT). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:728
  29. Emshoff R, Jank S, Bertram S, et al.  Disk displacement of the temporomandibular joint (Sonography versus MR imaging). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1557
  30. Ellis E, Fonseca RJ, Upton LG, et al.  A study of the utility of measuring the mandibular mobility by means of the interincisal dimension. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989;67:132

PII: S0278-2391(03)00840-1

doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.04.002

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 61, Issue 12 , Pages 1410-1417 , December 2003

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution