Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 659-668, April 2006

The Incidence of Postoperative Wound Healing Problems Following Sagittal Ramus Osteotomies Stabilized With Miniplates and Monocortical Screws

  • Craig Alpha, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Senior Resident, Highland General Hospital-Pacific Medical Center, Oakland, CA
  • ,
  • Felice O’Ryan, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Director, Maxillofacial Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, CA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr O’Ryan: Division of Maxillofacial Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland Medical Center, 280 West MacArthur Blvd, Oakland, CA 94611
  • ,
  • Alessandro Silva, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Formerly, Research Fellow, Division of Maxillofacial Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, CA; Currently, Private Practice, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • David Poor, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Director, Maxillofacial Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, CA

Purpose

Titanium plates and monocortical screws are commonly used to stabilize the mandible following sagittal split ramus osteotomies. Despite widespread use of this type of fixation, there is a paucity of large studies evaluating the infection rate and need for hardware removal.

Materials and Methods

This study is a retrospective cohort evaluation of 1,066 consecutive mandibular sagittal ramus osteotomies in 533 patients, performed between January 2002 and December 2003. All osteotomies were stabilized with 4-hole miniplates and 2.0 mm × 5.0 mm monocortical screws. Study variables included disturbances of wound healing, age, gender, plate and screw position, direction of mandibular movement, adjunctive procedures performed, and the patient’s medical history. Data were collected by chart and radiographic review. The above variables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test, Chi-square, Cochran-Armitage Trend Test, and multiple logistic regression.

Results

Of 533 patients 26% (138) demonstrated wound healing problems. This occurred in 15% of all 1,066 osteotomy sites. 6.5% of plates required removal in 10% of patients. In no case did disturbance of wound healing or plate removal result in non-union or relapse of the osteotomy. Wound healing problems were fewer when mandibular osteotomies were done in conjunction with maxillary surgery (18.9% versus 29.1%). Disturbances of wound healing were not related to the direction of movement of the mandible and were lower when hardware was placed closer to the inferior border.

Conclusion

An overall low incidence (6.5%) of hardware infection requiring plate removal was found in this study. Screw proximity to the osteotomy site did not correlate with higher rates of healing problems, but there was a statistically significant trend of fewer disturbances of healing when the hardware was placed closer to the inferior border of the mandible.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(05)01993-2

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.013

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 659-668, April 2006