Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 610-619, April 2006

Mandibular Mechanics After Osteotomy and Distraction Appliance Placement I: Postoperative Mobility of the Osteotomy Site

  • Zongyang Sun, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Graduate Student, Department of Oral Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Katherine L. Rafferty, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Mark A. Egbert, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor and Chief, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children’s Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Susan W. Herring, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Herring: Department of Orthodontics, Box 357446, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195

Purpose

Fixation at the osteotomy site for mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO) is probably not rigid, especially during mastication. Micromotion may affect the course of DO. This study aimed to measure the mobility of the fresh distractor-fixed osteotomy site in response to mastication and masticatory muscle stimulation.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-eight domestic pigs, 6 to 8 weeks old, underwent osteotomy of the right mandible and placement of a distractor appliance. Immediately after surgery, displacement at 3 different locations (superior–lateral, inferior–lateral, and inferior–medial) of the osteotomy site was assessed using ultrasound piezoelectric crystals or differential variable reluctance transducers (DVRTs). The amount of lengthening or shortening at each location was measured during mastication and muscle stimulation. Displacement was also measured for bilateral osteotomy during muscle stimulation from a subgroup of 12 pigs.

Results

The osteotomy site demonstrated significant mobility during power strokes of mastication with an average magnitude of 0.3 to 0.4 mm. Distinct patterns of displacement were associated with different locations, and the patterns varied between chewing sides. The most common pattern was lengthening at the superior–lateral and shortening at both inferior sites. Similar amounts of displacement were observed during the stimulation of jaw-closers (masseter and medial pterygoid), but the patterns produced by these muscles did not completely explain the masticatory pattern. Opening the osteotomy to 1.5 mm did not alter the displacements observed during muscle stimulation. Bilateral osteotomy tended to decrease displacement.

Conclusions

The study demonstrates that during mastication and masticatory muscle stimulation, an acute mandibular osteotomy site is mobile despite fixation by a distractor appliance.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funded by PHS (award DE 14336).

PII: S0278-2391(05)01998-1

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.008

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 610-619, April 2006