Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 620-627, April 2006

Mandibular Mechanics Following Osteotomy and Appliance Placement II: Bone Strain on the Body and Condylar Neck

  • Katherine L. Rafferty, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Herring: Department of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Box 357446, Seattle, WA 98195
  • ,
  • Zongyang Sun, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Graduate Student, Department of Oral Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Mark A. Egbert, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor and Chief, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children’s Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Emily E. Baird, BS

      Affiliations

    • Dental Student, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Susan W. Herring, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Purpose

The purpose of this investigation was to determine if the mechanical environment of the mandible is changed by osteotomy and fixation, as assessed by the measurement of bone strain on the condylar neck and mandibular corpus.

Materials and Methods

Immediately following unilateral mandibular osteotomy and distractor placement, strain gauges were attached directly to the corpus and condylar neck in a sample of domestic pigs. Bone strains were recorded during mastication and muscle stimulation. Comparisons of principal strain magnitudes and orientations were made between sides and between the osteotomy sample and a control database.

Results

The animals preferred to chew on the non-osteotomy side. Corpus strains were higher for osteotomy-side chewing but were comparable to the control database, regardless of chewing side. For the condyle, compared with the control database and the non-osteotomy side, the osteotomy side was underloaded in compression. Furthermore, the orientation of compressive strain was highly variable and more horizontally oriented than that of control and non-osteotomy condyles. Stimulation of the masseter and medial pterygoid loaded the mandible to normal levels.

Conclusion

Masticatory behavior was altered, probably as a combined result of disruption of the occlusion, changes in muscle recruitment, and probable loss of sensory feedback. However, neither these changes nor damage to the muscles explain the decrease and reorientation of compressive strain on the condylar neck. Alternatively, the modified strain pattern could have arisen from positional instability of the proximal bone fragment.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This project was funded by NIH awards R01 DE 14336 and P60 DE 13061.

PII: S0278-2391(05)01999-3

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.007

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 620-627, April 2006