Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 674-682, April 2006

Implant Reconstruction of the Bone- Grafted Maxilla: Review of the Literature and Presentation of 8 Cases

  • Lewis Clayman, DMD, MD

      Affiliations

    • Chief, OMS Service, Sinai Grace Hospital, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Chief, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI; Clinical Adjunct Professor, OMS, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Clinical Associate Professor, Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI; Private Practice, OMS Consultants, Southfield, MI
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Clayman: OMS Consultants, 29355 Northwestern Highway, Suite 200, Southfield, MI 48034

Purpose

This study prospectively investigates the long-term success of iliac crest bone grafting and the secondary placement of osseointegrated implants in reconstructing maxillae with severely reduced bone mass.

Materials and Methods

Eight consecutive patients (7 women, 1 man), aged 18 to 69 (mean, 49.6), were treated by augmentation of their maxillae with corticocancellous autogenous iliac bone blocks. Forty-one Branemark implants of 7 to 15 mm in length and 3.75 mm in diameter were placed after a minimum delay of 6 months. Bone healing, maintenance of bone height, and implant stability were measured by clinical examination and radiographic control.

Results

One patient was lost to follow-up at 24 months after delivery of the prosthesis and one was lost at 75 months. The average duration of follow-up after loading of the implants was 90.5 months, and the longest was 154 months. Thirty-four of 41 (83%) of the implants survived to the end of the observation period. Four of 6 implants that failed were 7 mm in length and the other 2 were 10 mm in length. One 10-mm implant was “slept” because of poor positioning. All prostheses survived. There was one significant gingival infection that resulted in loss of 1.5 mm of bone after which the implant remained stable. None of the other implants were associated with crestal bone loss of more than 0.5 mm for the duration of this study.

Conclusions

Delayed placement of osseointegrated implants in maxillae augmented by iliac bone grafts is predictable and successful in the long term.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The author has no commercial interests and has not received funding from any source for this study and does not hold consultantships with any commercial enterprise.

PII: S0278-2391(05)02002-1

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.026

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 674-682, April 2006