Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 5 , Pages 799-803 , May 2006

Surgical Technique for Achieving Implant Parallelism and Measurement of the Discrepancy in Panoramic Radiograph

  • Coen Pramono, DDS, MS, OMFS

      Affiliations

    • Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Airlangga University/Dr. Soetomo General Public Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Pramono: c/o Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Universitas Airlangga, Jl. Prof Dr Moestopo No. 47, Surabaya, Indonesia

References 

  1. Misch CE . Contemporary Implant Dentistry . St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1993;
  2. Lekholm U , Zarb GA . Patient selection and preparation . In:  Branemark P-I ,  Zarb GA ,  Albrektsson T editor. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses (Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry) . Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1985;p. 199–209
  3. Watzek GW . Endosseous Implants (Scientific and Clinical Aspects) . Berlin: Quintessence; 1996;
  4. Hall J , Lausmaa J . Properties of a new porous oxide surface on titanium implants . Applied Osseointegration Res . 2000;1:5
  5. Larsson C . The interface between bone and implants with different surface oxide properties . Applied Osseointegration Res . 2000;1:9
  6. Henry PJ , Tan AES , Allan BP , et al.   Removal torque comparison of TiUnite and turned implants in the greyhound dog mandible . Applied Osseointegration Res . 2000;1:15
  7. Rompen E , DaSilva D , Lundgren AK , et al.   Stability measurement of a double-threaded titanium implant design with turned or oxidized surface. An experimental resonance frequency analysis study in the dog mandible . Applied Osseointegration Res . 2000;1:18
  8. Albrektsson T , Johansson C , Lundgren AK , et al.   Experimental studies on oxidized implants. A histomorphometrical and biomechanical analysis . Applied Osseointegration Res . 2000;1:21
  9. Gottlow J , Johansson C , Albrektsson T , et al.   Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of the TiUnite and Osseotite implant surfaces in rabbits after 6 weeks of healing . Applied Osseointegration Res . 2000;1:25
  10. Gottlow J , Henry PJ , Tan AES , et al.   Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of the TiUnite and Osseotite surfaces in dogs . Applied Osseointegration Res . 2000;1:28
  11. Glauser R , Gottlow J , Lundgren AK , et al.   Immediate occlusal loading of Branemark MkIV TiUnite implants placed in bony quality type 4 . Applied Osseointegration Res . 2002;3:22
  12. Bertil F . Surgical approach and implant selection (Branemark System) in bone of various densities . Applied Osseointegration Res . 2002;3:9
  13. Glauser R , Gottlow J , Lundgren AK , et al.   Immediate loading of Branemark System implant with the TiUnite surface. Histological evaluation after 9 months . Applied Osseointegration Res . 2002;3:25
  14. Friberg B , Billstoerm C . Preliminary results of a prospective multicenter clinical study on TiUnite implant . Applied Osseointegration Res . 2002;3:29
  15. Kraut RA , Babbush CA . Radiographic evaluation of the implant candidate . In:  Babbush CA editors. Dental Implants. The Art and Science . Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2001;p. 35–57
  16. Schroeder A . Question related to the indications for ITI implant . In:  Schroeder A ,  Sutter F ,  Busser D ,  Krekeler G editor. Oral Implantology. Basics, ITI Hollow Cylinder System . New York, NY: Thieme; 1996;p. 226–293

PII: S0278-2391(06)00085-1

doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.01.018

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 5 , Pages 799-803 , May 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution