Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 6 , Pages 910-916 , June 2006

Acoustic Comparison of Vowel Sounds Produced Before and After Orthognathic Surgery for Mandibular Advancement

  • Matti Niemi, DDS

      Affiliations

    • PhD Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Resident, Department of Oral Diseases, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
    • ,
  • Juha-Pertti Laaksonen, MA

      Affiliations

    • PhD Student, Department of Phonetics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
    • ,
  • Timo Peltomäki, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
    • ,
  • Jukka Kurimo, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Orthodontist, Department of Oral Diseases, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
    • ,
  • Olli Aaltonen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Phonetics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
    • ,
  • Risto-Pekka Happonen, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Turku; Chief Physician, Department of Oral Diseases, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Happonen: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Turku, Lemminkäisenkatu 2, FIN20520 Turku, Finland

References 

  1. Hamlet S , Cullison BL , Stone ML . Physiological control of sibilant duration (Insights afforded by speech compensation to dental prosthesis) . J Acoust Soc Am . 1979;65:1276
  2. Lindblom B , Lubker J , Gay T . Formant frequencies of some fixed-mandible vowels and a model of speech motor programming by predictive simulation . J Phon . 1979;7:147
  3. McFarland DH , Baum SR . Incompletely compensation to articulatory perturbation . J Acoust Soc Am . 1995;97:1865
  4. Wakumoto M , Isaacson KG , Friel S , et al.   Preliminary study of articulatory reorganization of fricative consonants following osteotomy . Folia Phoniatr Logop . 1996;48:275
  5. Ruscello DM , Tekieli ME , Jakomis T , et al.   The effects of orthognathic surgery on speech production . Am J Orthod . 1986;89:237
  6. Dalston RM , Vig PS . Effects of orthognathic surgery on speech (A prospective study) . Am J Orthod . 1984;86:291
  7. Lee ASY , Whitehill TL , Ciocca V , et al.   Acoustic and perceptual analysis of the sibilant sound /s/ before and after orthognathic surgery . J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 2002;60:364
  8. Glass L , Knapp J , Bloomer H . Speech and lingual behavior before and after mandibular osteotomy . J Oral Surg . 1977;35:104
  9. Witzel MA , Ross R , Munro I . Articulation before and after facial osteotomy . J Maxillofac Surg . 1980;8:195
  10. Farrell CD , Kent JN . Evaluation of the surgical stability of 20 cases of inverted-L and C osteotomies . J Oral Surg . 1977;35:239
  11. Gardner AF . Dental, oral, and general causes of speech pathology . Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol . 1949;2:742
  12. Ruscello DM , Tekieli ME , Van Sickels JE . Speech production before and after orthognathic surgery (A review) . Oral Surg . 1985;59:10
  13. Vallino LD . Speech, velopharyngeal function, and hearing before and after orthognathic surgery . J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1990;48:1274
  14. Yamamoto T , Imai T , Umeda K . Acoustic characteristics of the fricatives in the surgical class III patients . In:  Morimoto T ,  Matsuya T ,  Takada K editor. Brain and Oral Functions (Oral Motor Function and Dysfunction) . Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 1995;
  15. Bowers J , Tobey EA , Shaye R . An acoustic-speech study of patients who received orthognathic surgery . Am J Orthod . 1985;88:373
  16. Flanagan JL . In: Speech Analysis Synthesis and Perception (ed 2) . Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1972;p. 280–281
  17. Lehiste I . In: Suprasegmentals . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1970;p. 13
  18. Hawkins S . Re-evaluating assumptions about speech perception (Interactive and integrative theories) . In:  Pickett JM editors. The Acoustics of Speech Communication (Fundamentals, Speech Perception Theory, and Technology) . Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1999;
  19. Perkell JS , Guenther FH , Lane H , et al.   A theory of speech motor control and supporting data from speakers with normal hearing and with profound hearing loss . J Phon . 2000;28:233
  20. Houde JF , Jordan MI . Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production . Science . 1998;279:1213
  21. Kent RD , Martin RE , Sufit RL . Oral sensation (A review and clinical prospective) . In:  Winitz H editors. Human Communication and Its Disorders . Norwood, New York: Ablex; 1990;
  22. Hardcastle WJ . Physiology of Speech Production . New York: Academic Press; 1981;
  23. Fant G . Acoustic Theory of Speech Production . (ed 2). The Hague: Mouton & Co NV; 1970;
  24. Stevens K . On the quantal nature of speech . J Phon . 1989;17:3

PII: S0278-2391(06)00233-3

doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.02.009

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 6 , Pages 910-916 , June 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution