Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 6 , Pages 896-901, June 2006

Prognostic Predictors of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Buccal Mucosa With Negative Surgical Margins

  • Jie Jing, MD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Ningxia Medical College, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China, PRC, and Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
  • ,
  • Longjiang Li, MD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Li: Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, 610041
  • ,
  • Wei He, MD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
  • ,
  • Gang Sun, MD

      Affiliations

    • Lecturer, Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Purpose

To study the prognostic factors of squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa (BMSCC) with negative surgical margins.

Patients and Methods

Forty-five untreated negative marginal cases were studied for predictors of recurrence, cervical lymph node metastasis, and survival. Clinicopathologic features included age, gender, duration of tumor, primary tumor (T) classification, pathologic clinical stage, tumor differentiation, tumor thickness, number of mitoses, and lymphocytic infiltration.

Results

The recurrence and metastasis rate was 40% and 44.4%, respectively. With univariate analysis, the predictors of recurrence were T classification, tumor differentiation, pathologic clinical stage, and lymphocytic infiltration. Average tumor thickness was greater than 5.68 mm. For cervical lymph node metastasis, the predictors include T classification, tumor differentiation, and lymphocytic infiltration. Tumor thickness was greater than 5.17 mm; number of mitoses was greater than 2.92/high power field (HPF). With logistical regression, only tumor thickness was the predictor of recurrence. T classification and tumor thickness were the predictors for cervical lymph node metastasis. Using Cox multivariate proportional hazards regression model, the survival disadvantage factors were T classification and recurrence. The hazard grand for T classification was 2.185; for recurrence it was 74.808.

Conclusions

Because T classification (between T1 + T2 and T3 + T4) and tumor thickness (more than 5.17 mm) were the predictors for cervical lymph node metastasis, neck dissection should be carried out routinely in T3 and T4 patients; whereas for T1 and T2 patients, neck dissection is necessary if tumor thickness is greater than 5.17 mm. T classification and recurrence are predictive factors for survival.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(06)00235-7

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.02.007

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 6 , Pages 896-901, June 2006