Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 6 , Pages 902-909, June 2006

Intraoperative Noncontact, Nonionizing, Optical 3D Exophthalmometry During Repositioning of Dislocated Globes: First Results

  • Manuel Kramer

      Affiliations

    • Medical Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Nkenke: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Glueckstr. 11, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
  • ,
  • Tobias Maier, MSc

      Affiliations

    • PhD Student, Chair for Optics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • ,
  • Michaela Benz, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Chair for Optics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • ,
  • Leonard M. Holbach, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • ,
  • Gerd Häusler, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Chair for Optics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • ,
  • Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam, MD, DMD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • ,
  • Emeka Nkenke, MD, DMD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany

Purpose

This study reports on the intraoperative use of noncontact, nonionizing, optical 3-dimensional (3D) exophthalmometry during the repositioning of dislocated globes as a result of trauma.

Patients and Methods

Ten patients (4 female, 6 male, 41.4 ± 15.2 years) with a relative enophthalmos of the globe as a result of zygomatic fractures were included in the study. Preoperatively, en- and exophthalmometry data were assessed from axial CT slices and optical 3D imaging. 3D data were analyzed twice for the assessment of measurement errors. Intraoperatively, optical en- and exophthalmometry was carried out to control the globe position. Surgery was considered successful when the relative en- or exophthalmos no longer exceeded 2 mm. Optical 3D en- and exophthalmometry data were reassessed 5 days and 3 months after surgery.

Results

Method error was 0.184 mm for optical 3D en- and exophthalmometry. The preoperatively assessed en- and exophthalmometry data determined from axial CT scans and from optical 3D images did not differ significantly statistically (P = .538). When the preoperative en- and exophthalmometry data were compared to the values assessed at the end of surgery, a significant improvement in globe position was found (P = .005). Although a relative en- or exophthalmos of 2 mm was not exceeded in any of the patients 3 months after surgery, en- and exophthalmometry data differed significantly statistically from the data assessed at the end of the operation (P = .005).

Conclusions

Intraoperative optical en- and exophthalmometry is an effective means to support the surgeon in objectively optimizing the globe position with small measurement errors.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by the “Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft” (Special Research Sector 603, Model-Based Analysis and Visualization of Complex Scenes and Sensor Data-Subproject C4).

PII: S0278-2391(06)00241-2

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.02.022

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 6 , Pages 902-909, June 2006