Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 8 , Pages 1185-1189, August 2006

Implant Survival Rates for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residents: A Retrospective Clinical Review With Analysis of Resident Level of Training on Implant Survival

  • Maico D. Melo, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Melo: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Room GA-144, Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street NW, Washington DC 20010
  • ,
  • Hamid Shafie, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Implant Consultant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.
  • ,
  • George Obeid, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Chair, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.

Purpose

This study evaluates dental implant survival rates in cases where surgery was performed by oral and maxillofacial residents and determines whether the level of resident training influenced the outcome of dental implant treatment.

Patients and Methods

Retrospective review of all 2-stage implants placed between July 1, 2002 and June 30, 2004 by oral and maxillofacial surgery residents-in-training at the Washington Hospital Center was carried out. Patients were seen for follow-up at 1-week, 1-month, and 6-month intervals after implant surgery. The criteria for implant success in this study were based on clinical and radiographic evidence of implant osseointegration during the follow-up period. We evaluated implant survival rates and used Cox proportional hazards modeling to analyze whether level of resident training or location of implant placement influenced implant survival.

Results

This study included 175 implants placed in 54 patients. The overall survival rate of implants placed by oral and maxillofacial surgery residents at all levels of training was 91%. No statistically significant difference in implant survival rates was observed as a function of the level of training of the resident surgeon (P = .89) or location of implant placement (P = .93).

Conclusion

Survival rates for implants placed by surgeons in training are comparable to rates reported in the literature. There was no statistically significant difference in survival rates when a comparison of level of training was taken into consideration. To our knowledge, this study is the first to examine implant survival rates as a function of surgeon experience in the setting of an oral and maxillofacial residency program and suggests that predictable outcomes in implant treatment are attainable by surgeons in training.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(06)00571-4

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.04.014

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 8 , Pages 1185-1189, August 2006