Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 10 , Pages 1553-1560, October 2006

New Fixation Method for Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis Using Locking Attachments

  • Eduardo Yugo Suzuki, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Instructor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiangmai University, Chiangmai, Thailand.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Suzuki: Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiangmai University, Suthep Road, Amphur Muang, Chiangmai 50270, Thailand
  • ,
  • Boonsiva Buranastidporn, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Instructor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiangmai University, Chiangmai, Thailand.
  • ,
  • Masatoshi Ishii, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Tokyo, Japan.

Purpose

The external traction hooks of the intraoral splint used in the rigid external distraction (RED) system for maxillary distraction osteogenesis interfere with the surgical procedures. The purpose of this study is to introduce an innovative splint fixation method for maxillary distraction osteogenesis with Locking Attachments and evaluate their advantages, such as reduction of operating time compared with the traditional intraoral splint method.

Patients and Methods

Retrospective comparison of operative times of maxillary Le Fort I osteotomy procedures was carried out with the traditional protocol using the intraoral splint cemented to the maxillary dentition (n = 14), and a removable intraoral splint that is inserted postsurgically (n = 14). Operative procedure times were compared and analyzed statistically using the data extracted from the surgical records.

Results

There were no complications inserting the removable splint postsurgically, including pain, discomfort, or time-consuming procedure. Stable and secure splint fixation was obtained before the distraction procedure and the desired treatment goals were obtained in all patients. The total operative procedure times were significantly reduced in the Locking Attachments group by 24% to 41% (approximately 65 minutes) compared with earlier operations involving the conventional splints (P < .05).

Conclusions

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis with the Locking Attachments is a highly effective fixation approach to manage severe hypoplastic maxilla, eliminating lip constraints resulting from scarring and allowing for easier, more deliberate and careful dissection. The use of the Locking Attachments is reliable in craniofacial surgery and has proved to be advantageous in the reduction of the operating time and surgical risks.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(06)01077-9

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.038

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 10 , Pages 1553-1560, October 2006