Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 10 , Pages 1506-1509 , October 2006

Comparison of Mandibular Rami Width in Patients With Prognathism and Retrognathia

  • Danilo P.B. Ribeiro, DDS, PHD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Oral Surgery, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, and Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Ribeiro: Rua Visconde de Pirajá, 550/1805 – Ipanema, 22410-002 Rio de Janeiro – RJ, Brazil
  • ,
  • Italo H.A. Gandelmann, DDS, PHD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chairman, Department of Oral Surgery, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, and Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • ,
  • Paulo J. Medeiros, DDS, PHD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chairman, Department of Oral Surgery, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, and Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

References 

  1. Ozawa Y , Shibahara T , Takagi T , et al.   Surgical simulation of Class III edentulous patient using a 3D craniofacial model: Report of a case . Bull Tokyo Dent Coll . 2000;41:73
  2. Nishioka GJ , Aragon SB . Modified sagittal split technique for patients with high lingula . J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1989;47:426
  3. Smith BR , Rajchel JL , Waite DE , et al.   Mandibular ramus anatomy as it relates to the medial osteotomy of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy . J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1991;49:112
  4. Hallikainen D , Iizuka T , Lindqvist C . Cross-sectional tomography in evaluation of patients undergoing sagittal split osteotomy . J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1992;50:1269
  5. Rajchel J , Ellis E , Fonseca RJ . The anatomical location of the mandibular canal: Its relationship to the sagittal ramus osteotomy . Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg . 1986;1:37
  6. Kohakura S , Kasai K , Ohno I , et al.   Relationship between maxillofacial morphology and morphological characteristics of vertical sections of the mandible obtained by CT scanning . J NihonUniv Sch Dent . 1997;39:71
  7. Tsunori M , Mashita M , Kasai K . Relationship between facial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning . Angle Orthod . 1997;68:557
  8. Muto T , Shigeo K , Yamamoto K , et al.   Computed tomography morphology of the mandibular ramus in prognathism: Effect on the medial osteotomy of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy . J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 2003;61:89
  9. Alder ME , Deahl ST , Matteson SR . Clinical usefulness of two-dimensional reformatted and three-dimensionally rendered computerized tomographic images: Literature review and a survey of surgeons’ opinions . J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1995;53:375
  10. Klinge B , Petersson A , Maly P . Location of the mandibular canal: Comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography . Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl . 1989;4:327
  11. Ylikontiola L , Moberg K , Huumonen S , et al.   Comparison of three radiographic methods used to locate the mandibular canal in the buccolingual direction before bilateral sagittal split osteotomy . Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod . 2002;93:736
  12. Yune HY . Two-dimensional–three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography techniques . Dent Clin North Am . 1993;37:613
  13. Kim HJ , Lee HY , Chung IH , et al.   Mandibular anatomy related to sagittal split ramus osteotomy in Koreans . Yonsei Med J . 1997;38:19
  14. Epker BN , Stella JP , Fish LC . In: Dentofacial Deformities – Integrated Orthodontic and Surgical Correction . Vol II: St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book; 1996;p. 569–1183

PII: S0278-2391(06)01188-8

doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.07.001

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 10 , Pages 1506-1509 , October 2006