Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 10 , Pages 1926-1934, October 2007

Secondary Post-Traumatic Enophthalmos: High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With Multislice Computed Tomography in Postoperative Orbital Volume Measurement

  • Andreas Kolk, MD, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Senior Consultant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Technology of Munich, Munich, Germany.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Kolk: Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Technology of Munich, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Christoph Pautke, MD, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Technology of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • ,
  • Verena Schott, MD

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Technology of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • ,
  • Ester Ventrella, MD

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Technology of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • ,
  • Edzard Wiener, MD

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Technology of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • ,
  • Oliver Ploder, MD, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.
  • ,
  • Hans Henning Horch, MD, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Technology of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • ,
  • Andreas Neff, MD, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Senior Consultant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Technology of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Purpose

Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) was the modality of choice for orbital volume measurement. This first prospective study compares MSCT with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with micro (MRImc) and headcoil (MRIhc) in volumetric evaluation of the postsurgical enophthalmic orbit.

Patients and Methods

Morphologic and dimensional changes of the orbit, eyebulb, and fat content were investigated 3 to 4 months after reconstruction of complex orbital fractures in 36 patients. Image analysis and volumetric assessment from 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional-MRImc and MRIhc were compared with MSCT. The volume segmentation algorithm operated on multispectral, 3-dimensional MR data acquired at isotropic proton density weighted acquisitions.

Results

CT and MRI volume data correlated significantly (P < .01). Enlargement of the posterior segment often resulted in orbital geometry change from conical to convex. Even cases of correct orbital reconstruction presented significant volume enlargement compared to the contralateral side (P < .01). The retro bulbar fat showed itself fragmented and was dislocated in the medial posterior region mostly. We found reduced sagittal eye projection, increased width of the orbital rim, and dislocation of the posteromedial orbital floor (P < .01). High correlation was detected between orbital volume increment and degree of enophthalmos (0.93 mm per 1 cm3 orbital volume enlargement diameter) (P < .01).

Conclusions

As MRI orbital volume measurement permitted prediction of postsurgical enophthalmos, which is related to possible failure in orbital volume correction and reduction of the posterior medial bulge and not to fat content changes, it is suited for planning secondary correction.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(06)01202-X

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.269

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 10 , Pages 1926-1934, October 2007