Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 3 , Pages 384-392, March 2007

Immediate Placement of Dental Implants Into Debrided Infected Dentoalveolar Sockets

  • Nardy Casap, DMD, MD

      Affiliations

    • Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Casap: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hadassah Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University, PO Box 2272, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
  • ,
  • Chassiel Zeltser, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • ,
  • Alon Wexler, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Instructor, Department of Prosthodontics, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • ,
  • Eyal Tarazi, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Instructor, Department of Prosthodontics, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • ,
  • Rephael Zeltser, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.

Purpose

To describe a protocol for the immediate placement of endosseous implants into debrided infected dentoalveolar sockets.

Patients and Methods

A total of 30 implants were immediately placed into debrided infected sites in 20 patients. The pathology at the receptacle dentoalveolar sockets varied, and included subacute periodontal infection, perio-endo infection, chronic periodontal infection, chronic periapical lesion, and a periodontal cyst. The immediate placement protocol emphasized the meticulous debridement of the infected tissues in combination with peripheral ostectomy of the alveoli. Guided bone regeneration was accomplished to support bony healing of alveolar defects surrounding the implantation site. Pre- and postsurgical antibiotic therapy was administered.

Results

All implants but 1 were osseointegrated and functional when followed up after 12 to 72 months. One implant was mobile after its immediate restoration and was removed. Complications were related to the use of guided bone regeneration. Deficiency of the attached gingiva was noted in 1 case. The treatment approach is illustrated in 2 anterior maxilla cases with 3-year follow-up.

Conclusions

Successful immediate implantation in debrided infected alveoli depends on the complete removal of all contaminated tissue and the controlled regeneration of the alveolar defect. With this proposed clinical approach, experienced clinicians may consider immediate implants as a viable treatment option in patients presenting with dentoalveolar infections.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(06)01221-3

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.02.031

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 3 , Pages 384-392, March 2007