Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 4 , Pages 680-685, April 2007

Third Molar Root Development and Recovery from Third Molar Surgery

  • Haeman Noori

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgerySchool of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • ,
  • David L. Hill, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgerySchool of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • ,
  • Daniel A. Shugars, DDS, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Operative DentistrySchool of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • ,
  • Ceib Phillips, MPH, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of OrthodonticsSchool of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • ,
  • Raymond P. White Jr, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Dalton L. McMichael Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgerySchool of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr White: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450

Purpose

This study was conducted to determine if the completeness of the root formation of mandibular third molars prior to removal affected clinical and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) recovery.

Patients and Methods

Data from HRQOL responses from patients and clinical outcome data were available after third molar surgery conducted by surgeons in community practice and academic centers. The root development of each mandibular third molar on presurgery panoramic radiographs for these patients was assessed by trained clinician observers. Patients were categorized as those with complete root formation (both mandibular third molars had 100% completely formed roots) or as those with incomplete root formation (at least 1 mandibular third molar not completely formed). The proportion of patients who experienced delayed clinical or HRQOL recovery that exceeded a clinically relevant criterion value were compared for these 2 groups of patients using χ2 statistics. Level of significance was set at 0.05.

Results

Both mandibular third molars had 100% completely formed roots in 118 patients; at least 1 mandibular third molar was not completely formed in 218 patients. If patients had a mandibular third molar with roots less than 100% complete, they more likely: were female (65% vs 58%), were less than 25 years old (95% vs 54%), P < .01, and had not finished high school (59% vs 28%), P < .01. For those with incomplete root formation, bone removal for both mandibular third molars was more likely (84% vs 67%), P < .01, and the surgeons’ overall estimate of degree of difficulty was greater (14/28 vs 12/28), P = .02. Median surgery time did not differ between groups. The proportion of patients who experienced delayed clinical or HRQOL recovery did not differ between the incomplete and complete root formation groups.

Conclusions

Incomplete lower third molar root formation presurgery may not be a predictor of better or worse clinical or HRQOL recovery after surgery. Other clinical, demographic, and health indicators should influence surgeons’ recommendations and patients’ decisions regarding third molar treatment including surgery.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funded by the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Foundation, American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, and Dental Foundation of North Carolina.

PII: S0278-2391(06)01364-4

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.02.035

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 4 , Pages 680-685, April 2007