Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 4 , Pages 615-620, April 2007

Mandibular Condyle Reconstruction With Inlay Application of Autogenous Costochondral Graft After Condylectomy: Cerrahpaşa’s Technique

  • M. Zeki Güzel, MD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chairman, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Güzel: I.U. Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty Hospital, 34303 Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Hakan Arslan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Registrar, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • ,
  • Mesut Saraç, MD

      Affiliations

    • Plastic Surgeon, Private Practice, Istanbul, Turkey.

Purpose

Mandibular condyle reconstruction with free costochondral grafting is the most common method because of some advantages, such as its biological and anatomic similarities to the condyle, and growth potential in juveniles. Application techniques of the costochondral graft were reported in numerous articles with several advantages and disadvantages up to now. The purpose of this article is to present a new modification in application of the costochondral graft to the ramus of the mandible. This technique is pretty simple, but very effective.

Materials and Methods

The new technique described here consisted of a costochondral graft application for temporomandibular joint reconstruction, which was inserted into the medullary cavity of the mandibular ramus in 4 patients. This modification provided the graft placement as anatomical as the original condyle and further stabilized the graft in its position and inhibited its displacement without any fixation. This technique is pretty simple because an additional incision to the preauricular, facial nerve dissection, wide exposition and stabilization efforts are not required.

Results

Clinical and radiological evaluations on 14-month mean follow-up of 4 cases showed very satisfactory functional results with normal anatomic adaptation and configuration. In all cases, function of mandible was considered to be good with at least maximal interincisal opening of 30 mm. Good anatomical position of the graft and good bony healing were seen on the radiographs. Additionally, there was no need for postoperative intermaxillary fixation.

Conclusion

With this technique, temporomandibular joint reconstruction by the costochondral graft can be performed as far as possible to the original condyle position.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(06)01387-5

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.061

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 4 , Pages 615-620, April 2007