Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 3 , Pages 427-433, March 2007

Office-Based Dental Rehabilitation in Children With Special Healthcare Needs Using a Pediatric Sedation Service Model

  • Kirk Lalwani, MD, FRCA

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, and Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Lalwani: Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, UHS-2, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239
  • ,
  • Jonathan Kitchin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
  • ,
  • Peter Lax, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Purpose

1) To review our experience with office-based sedation/anesthesia for children with special healthcare needs who underwent dental rehabilitation at our institution. 2) To compare the cost to comparable patients who underwent similar procedures in the operating room.

Patients and Methods

Retrospective review of patients’ medical records and the sedation service database. Group CL: 114 patients who underwent office-based dental rehabilitation (135 procedures). Group OR: 23 patients who underwent dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia in the operating room for cost comparison. Outcomes: 1) Efficacy (procedure completion rate and unplanned admissions); 2) Safety (complications and interventions); 3) Comparison of mean hospital charges billed between groups.

Results

Demographics were similar in both groups. The most common specific underlying diagnoses were autism (38%), cerebral palsy/developmental delay (18%) and ADHD (4%) in both groups. Efficacy: procedure completion rate was 98.5% (2 aborted). There was 1 (0.7%) unplanned postanesthetic care unit admission due to an adverse drug event. Safety: 2 (1.5%) patients required invasive airway control. Eighteen (13.3%) patients developed transient hypoxemia. Twenty-three (17%) patients had airway obstruction needing simple intervention, and 1 (0.7%) patient had hypotension. There were no serious complications. Cost: mean total hospital charges were considerably higher in group OR ($6,126), versus group CL ($1,277), even after adjustment for inflation and length of procedure (P < .0001).

Conclusion

Office-based dental rehabilitation using a pediatric sedation service model in children with special needs is efficient, and can achieve average savings of $4,849 in hospital charges per patient.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(06)01393-0

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.057

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 3 , Pages 427-433, March 2007