Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 1 , Pages 66-73, January 2007

Temporomandibular Joint Internal Derangement and Osteoarthrosis: Are Effusion and Bone Marrow Edema Prognostic Indicators for Arthrocentesis and Hydraulic Distention?

  • Rüdiger Emshoff, MD, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Clinic Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Emshoff: University Clinic Innsbruck, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Maximilianstrasse 10, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
  • ,
  • Ansgar Rudisch, MD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, University Clinic Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Purpose

Arthrocentesis and hydraulic distention of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) has proven to be an effective modality in treating patients exhibiting clinical findings consistent with the diagnosis of disc displacement without reduction. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) variables of effusion and/or bone marrow edema may predict treatment outcomes of arthrocentesis and hydraulic distention of the TMJ.

Patients and Methods

The study group comprised 37 consecutive patients with TMJ pain, who were assigned a unilateral clinical TMJ disorder of TMJ pain associated with an internal derangement (ID) type III (disc displacement without reduction) and a TMJ pain side–related MRI diagnosis of disc displacement without reduction associated with osteoarthrosis (OA). Bilateral sagittal and coronal MRI images were obtained immediately before the operation to establish the presence or absence of ID, OA, TMJ effusion, and bone marrow edema. Pain level and mandibular range of motion (ROM) were assessed preoperatively and compared with the respective 2-month follow-up findings. Outcome criteria for success were a ROM ≥35 mm and pain reduction >50%. A logistic regression analysis was used to compute the odds ratio for TMJ effusion and bone marrow edema for successful outcomes (n = 21) versus unsuccessful (n = 16) outcomes.

Results

At the 2-month follow-up, clinical evaluation showed a significant reduction in TMJ pain during function (P = .000), a significant reduction in clinical diagnoses of TMJ disorders (P = .016), and a significant increase in ROM (P = .000). A significant increase in the risk of an unsuccessful outcome of ROM <35 mm and/or pain reduction ≥50% occurred with MRI findings of effusion (odds ratio 1:10.8 = 0.09; P = .007).

Conclusions

TMJ effusion may prove to be an important prognostic determinant of successful arthrocentesis. However, the data re-emphasize the concept that the prediction of a specific outcome is not a matter of simple linearity, in which the presence of 1 factor may equate with predictive ability, but rather is a function of a complex interaction among different biological variables.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(06)01395-4

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.113

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 1 , Pages 66-73, January 2007