The Functional Long-Term Results After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO) With and Without a Condylar Positioning Device

Gerressen, Marcus; Zadeh, Mohsen Dabir; Stockbrink, Gereon; Riediger, Dieter; Ghassemi, Alireza

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.110

« Previous Next »Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 11 , Pages 1624-1630, November 2006

The Functional Long-Term Results After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO) With and Without a Condylar Positioning Device

Marcus Gerressen, MD, DMD, PhD
- Resident, Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
- Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Gerressen: Klinik für Zahn-, Mund-, Kiefer-, und Plastische Gesichtschirurgie Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Mohsen Dabir Zadeh, MD, DMD, PhD
- Fellow, Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Gereon Stockbrink, MD, DMD, PhD
- Fellow, Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Dieter Riediger, MD, DMD, PhD
- Professor and Chair, Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Alireza Ghassemi, MD, DMD, PhD
- Assistant Professor, Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Purpose

The goal of this retrospective study was to examine whether utilization of condylar positioning devices in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy leads to long-term benefits for temporomandibular joint function as compared with the manual positioning technique.

Patients and Methods

The joint function of 49 patients (98 joints) who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or bimaxillary osteotomy at the University Hospital of Aachen between 1993 and 2003 was analyzed by recording joint movements with axiography supported by clinical examination of the temporomandibular joint. In 10 patients out of 28 with mandibular advancement and in 10 out of 21 with mandibular setback the Luhr positioning device was used intraoperatively to reproduce the condylar position. The joints of the remaining patients were positioned manually. The received data were statistically evaluated by using unrelated t test at P = .05.

Results

In mandibular advancement the manually positioned group showed significantly less signs of temporomandibular disorders, while there were slight advantages in axiographically measured joint track lengths for the patients who were operated with positioning devices. After mandibular setback surgery clinical analysis as well as axiography presented comparable results in both groups.

Conclusion

The use of a positioning device did not provide a better functional outcome long term in either mandibular advancement or setback surgery. With the manual positioning technique, an at least equally good temporomandibular joint function was attained.