Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 9 , Pages 1772-1779, September 2007

Measurement of Anterior Loop Length for the Mandibular Canal and Diameter of the Mandibular Incisive Canal to Avoid Nerve Damage When Installing Endosseous Implants in the Interforaminal Region

  • Yuki Uchida, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Fellow, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery; Private Practice, Uchida Dental Clinic, Chihaya, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Uchida: Uchida Dental Clinic, 2-27-5, Chihaya, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 813-0044, Japan
  • ,
  • Yoshio Yamashita, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saga Medical School, Nabeshima, Saga, Japan.
  • ,
  • Masaaki Goto, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chairman, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saga Medical School, Nabeshima, Saga, Japan.
  • ,
  • Tsunehiko Hanihara, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chairman, Department of Anatomy, Saga Medical School, Nabeshima, Saga, Japan.

Purpose

To measure the anterior loop length (ALL) for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal at various points to ascertain the mesial distance from the mental foramen at which it is safe to install endosseous implants in the most distal area of the interforaminal region.

Patients and Methods

Using 38 cadavers (75 hemimandibles), the ALL and the diameter of the incisive canal at its origin and at 1 mm intervals up to 5 mm mesially from the origin were measured using operative calipers.

Results

Measured data are expressed as minimum, maximum, and mean ± standard deviation. ALL was 0.0, 6.0, and 1.5 ± 1.4 mm, the diameter of the incisive canal was 1.0, 6.6, and 3.1 ± 1.2 mm at the origin, 0.6, 5.8, and 2.6 ± 1.1 mm at 1 mm, 0.5, 5.7, and 2.2 ± 1.0 mm at 2 mm, 0.5, 6.0, and 2.0 ± 1.0 mm at 3 mm, 0.5, 5.0, and 1.8 ± 0.8 mm at 4 mm, and 0.5, 4.9, and 1.7 ± 0.8 mm at 5 mm mesially.

Conclusion

The above results showed that because there may be large variations in the ALL and the diameter of the incisive canal, one should not assume that a fixed distance mesially from the mental foramen will be safe. Intraoperative examination of vital structures is indispensable for the safe installation of implants in the interforaminal area of the mandible. Not only the ALL but also the diameter of the incisive canal should be investigated on a case-by-case basis to determine the appropriate location for each individual.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(06)01907-0

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.015

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 9 , Pages 1772-1779, September 2007