Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 7, Supplement , Pages 33-39, July 2007

Peri-Implant Bone Level Around Implants With Platform-Switched Abutments: Preliminary Data From a Prospective Study

  • Markus Hürzeler, DMD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany; Clinical Associate Professor, University of Texas, Dental Branch, Houston, TX; Private Practice, Private Institute for Periodontology and Implantology, Munich, Germany.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Prof Hürzeler: Center for Dentistry, Peridontology and Implantology, Rosenkavalierplatz 18, Munich 81925, Germany
  • ,
  • Stefan Fickl, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Private Institute for Periodontology and Implantology, Munich, Germany.
  • ,
  • Otto Zuhr, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Private Institute for Periodontology and Implantology, Munich, Germany.
  • ,
  • Hannes C. Wachtel, DMD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, University School of Dental Medicine, Charite, Berlin, Germany; Private Practice, Private Institute for Periodontology and Implantology, Munich, Germany.

Purpose

Several long-term clinical studies have shown a mean marginal bone loss around dental implants of 1.5 to 2 mm in the first year after prosthetic restoration. Currently, concepts to avoid bone remodeling around dental implants have been developed. The use of prosthetic abutments with reduced width in relation to the implant diameter (platform switching) seems to have the greatest potential to limit the crestal resorption. The purpose of this clinical trial was to show that crestal bone height around dental implants could be influenced using a platform switch protocol and that the bone level would remain stable within 1 year after final prosthetic reconstruction.

Materials and Methods

Fifteen patients were treated with fixed implant retained prosthesis; 14 wide-diameter implants were supplied with platform-switched abutments and served as the test group. Eight implants with regular diameter were reconstructed with traditional abutments and served as the control group. Standardized digital radiographs were obtained for evaluation of the peri-implant bone levels at the time of installation of the final restoration and at 1-year follow-up. Marginal peri-implant bone levels were measured at the mesial and distal surfaces of each implant using digital image analysis.

Results

The mean values of crestal bone height at baseline were −0.09 mm ± 0.65 mm for the platform-switched implants and −1.73 mm ± 0.46 mm for the nonplatform-switched implants. One year after final restoration, the mean value of crestal bone height was −0.22 mm ± 0.53 mm for the test group and −2.02 mm ± 0.49 mm for the control group. When tested with statistical means, the differences were significant for baseline and for follow-up (P ≤ .0001). Mean bone level change from baseline to 1-year follow-up was −0.12 mm ± 0.40 mm for the test group and −0.29 mm ± 0.34 mm, respectively, for the control group. On analysis using ANCOVA, this difference was shown to be significant (P ≤ .0132).

Conclusion

The concept of platform switching appears to limit crestal resorption and seems to preserve peri-implant bone levels. A certain amount of bone remodeling 1 year after final reconstruction occurs, but significant differences concerning the peri-implant bone height compared with the nonplatform-switched abutments are still evident 1 year after final restoration. The reduction of the abutment of 0.45 mm on each side (5 mm implant/4.1 mm abutment) seems sufficient to avoid peri-implant bone loss.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(07)00378-3

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.03.024

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 7, Supplement , Pages 33-39, July 2007