Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 7, Supplement , Pages 13-19, July 2007

Effects of the Facial Osseous Defect Morphology on Gingival Dynamics After Immediate Tooth Replacement and Guided Bone Regeneration: 1-Year Results

  • Joseph Y.K. Kan, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Center for Prosthodontics and Implant Dentistry, Loma Linda University School of Dentistry; and Private Practice, Loma Linda, CA.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Kan: Department of Restorative Dentistry, Loma Linda University School of Dentistry, Loma Linda, CA 92354
  • ,
  • Kitichai Rungcharassaeng, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Loma Linda University School of Dentistry, Loma Linda, CA.
  • ,
  • Anthony Sclar, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Director, Clinical Research and Postgraduate Dental Implant Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nova Southeastern University School of Dentistry, Fort Lauderdale, FL; and Private Practice, Miami, FL.
  • ,
  • Jaime L. Lozada, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Director and Professor, Advanced Education in Implant Dentistry, Loma Linda University School of Dentistry, Loma Linda, CA.

Purpose

This article describes different scenarios of facial osseous defects when the osseous-gingival relationship exceeds 3 mm and evaluates the effects of the morphology of the compromised facial bone on gingival dynamics after immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration. The implant success rate and peri-implant bone change were also reported.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-three patients treated consecutively with the mean age of 39.5 years (range, 25 to 63 years) underwent immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration in sockets with facial bony defects exceeding 3 mm. Facial bony defects were categorized into V-, U-, and Ultra-U (UU)-shaped. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 1-year after implant placement.

Results

At 1-year, the implant success rate was 100% (23/23). No marginal bone change of greater than 1 mm was observed. Greater than 1.5 mm of facial gingival recessions were noted in 8.3% (1/12) of V-shaped, 42.8% (3/7) of U-shaped, and 100% (4/4) of UU-shaped defects.

Conclusions

U- and UU-shaped defects showed significantly higher frequency and magnitude of facial gingival recession (>1.5 mm) when compared with V-shaped defects 1-year after immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration. It is important to identify the type of facial bony defect during diagnosis and treatment planning, so that appropriate treatment can be prescribed. The combination of delayed implant placement after staged reconstruction of unfavorable U- and UU-shaped labial extraction socket defects should be considered in areas of high esthetic concern.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(07)00435-1

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.006

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 7, Supplement , Pages 13-19, July 2007