Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 12 , Pages 2487-2491 , December 2007

Effect of Surgical Techniques on Primary Implant Stability and Peri-Implant Bone

  • Mete I. Fanuscu, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Associate Clinical Professor, Division of Restorative Dentistry, Jane and Jerry Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA.
    • ,
  • Ting-Ling Chang, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Associate Clinicial Professor, Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, Jane and Jerry Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA.
    • ,
  • Kıvanç Akça, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Scholar, Division of Restorative Dentistry, the Jane and Jerry Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA; and Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Akça: Çetin Emeç Blv, 6 cadde, 54/3 06450, Öveçler, Ankara, Turkey

References 

  1. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The osteotome technique. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1994;15:152
  2. Nkenke E, Kloss F, Wiltfang J, et al. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic analysis of bone remodeling after installation of implants using an osteotome technique. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:595
  3. Büchter A, Kleinheinz J, Wiesmann HP, et al. Interface reaction at dental implants inserted in condensed bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:509
  4. Nkenke E, Lehner B, Fenner M, et al. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in the maxillae of minipigs: Follow-up implant stability and implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:39
  5. Büchter A, Kleinheinz J, Wiesmann HP, et al. Biological and biomechanical evaluation of bone remodeling and implant stability after using an osteotome technique. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:1
  6. Niimi A, Ozeki K, Ueda M, et al. A comparative study of removal torque or endosseous implants fibula, iliac crest and scapula of cadavers: A preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:286
  7. Çehreli MC, Akça K, Tönük E. Accuracy of a manual torque application device for Morse-taper implants: Technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:743
  8. Akkocaoglu M, Uysal S, Tekdemir I, et al. Implant design and intraosseous stability of immediately placed implants: A human cadaver study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:202
  9. Müller M, Van Campenhout H, Van Damme B, et al. Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: A quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. Bone. 1998;28:59
  10. Akça K, Chang TL, Tekdemir İ, et al. Biomechanical aspects of ınitial ıntraosseous stability and ımplant design: A quantitative micro-morphometric analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:465
  11. Rebaudi A, Koller B, Laib A, et al. Microcomputed tomographic analysis of the peri-implant bone. Int J Periodontal Restor Dent. 2004;24:316
  12. Burri C, Wolter D. The compressed autogenous spongiosis graft. Unfallheilkunde. 1977;80:169
  13. Spiessl B. A new method of anatomical reconstruction of extensive defects of the mandible with autogenous cancellous bone. J Maxillofac Surg. 1980;8:78

 This study was supported in part by The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey, Directorate of Human Resources Development (TUBITAK-BAYG, NATO B2) and by AstraTech AB.

PII: S0278-2391(07)00484-3

doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.017

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 12 , Pages 2487-2491 , December 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution