Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 66, Issue 3 , Pages 441-445, March 2008

Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Gel Versus Chlorhexidine Rinse in Reducing Alveolar Osteitis in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

  • Pilar Hita-Iglesias, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor and Master in Oral Surgery; and Clinical Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Hita-Iglesias: University of Michigan, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1500 Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0018
  • ,
  • Daniel Torres-Lagares, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Master in Oral Surgery, Department of Dentistry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
  • ,
  • Rafael Flores-Ruiz, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Master in Oral Surgery, Department of Dentistry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
  • ,
  • Natale Magallanes-Abad, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Master in Oral Surgery, Department of Dentistry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
  • ,
  • Marta Basallote-Gonzalez, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Research Assistant, Master in Oral Surgery, Department of Dentistry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
  • ,
  • Jose-Luis Gutierrez-Perez, MD, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chairman, Department of Dentistry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

Purpose

Chlorhexidine is an antimicrobial agent used in the prevention of postextraction alveolar osteitis, tooth decay, and periodontal diseases. There are various forms of chlorhexidine application. The most extensively studied is one that uses the rinse as the form of application. Recently, a bioadhesive gel form has become available. Its main advantage is that it prolongs the bioavailability of chlorhexidine in the application area. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of chlorhexidine gel versus a chlorhexidine rinse in reducing postoperative alveolar osteitis after the extraction of mandibular third molars.

Materials and Methods

The experimental or gel group (n = 41) applied the bioadhesive 0.2% chlorhexidine gel to the wound during the first postoperative week and a control or rinse group (n = 32) used a 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse during the first week postextraction.

Results

We observed a 70% decrease in postoperative alveolar osteitis in the gel group (P = .040). The rinse group had 25% incidence postoperative alveolar osteitis, while the gel group had 7.5%.

Conclusions

It was concluded that the topical application of bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel to the surgical wound during the postoperative week may decrease the incidence of alveolar osteitis after extraction of the mandibular third molars.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(07)01481-4

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.641

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 66, Issue 3 , Pages 441-445, March 2008