Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 12 , Pages 2492-2497, December 2007

Five Years of Experience Using Palatal Mini-Implants for Orthodontic Anchorage

  • Claudio Arcuri, MD, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chairman, Department of Odontostomatology, AFaR, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Isola Tiberina, and Professor of Periodontology, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” Rome, Italy.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Arcuri: Unità Operativa Complessa di Odontostomatologia, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli, Isola Tiberina, 00186 Roma, Italy
  • ,
  • Fabiana Muzzi, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Doctor in Dentistry, AFaR, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Isola Tiberina, and University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” Rome, Italy.
  • ,
  • Francesca Santini, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Doctor in Dentistry, AFaR, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Isola Tiberina, and University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” Rome, Italy.
  • ,
  • Alberta Barlattani, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Doctor in Dentistry, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” Rome, Italy.
  • ,
  • Aldo Giancotti, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” and AFaR, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy.

Purpose

The authors review 5 years of clinical experience using Straumann Orthosystem (Straumann, Basel, Switzerland) palatal mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage, describe clinical procedures, and give statistical results.

Materials and Methods

Diagnostic planning, surgical phase, and clinical procedure are described. The diagnostic planning was performed on lateral cephalogram in 13 cases; in 1 case, with an ectopically included upper canine, a computed tomography was requested. The Straumann Orthosystem kit includes a pure titanium implant with the healing cap, and a set of burs and instruments for the surgical insertion and removal. The sample comprised 14 adult patients (2 males and 12 females) requiring fixed orthodontic appliance for Class II malocclusion. Because of critical anchorage conditions they had received a palatal mini-implant as absolute anchorage during orthodontic treatment: 9 implants of 6.0 mm and 7 implants of 4.0 mm were positioned, primarily using a 2.5 mm transmucosal neck length. The orthodontic phase always started after 13 weeks of the insertion, in order to ensure osteointegration.

Results

In all cases, neither a perforation of the nasal cavity nor other surgical complication occurred. All implants have been successfully osteointegrated, except for 1 which has been lost for critical hygiene conditions. Two implants needed to be replaced because of tongue forces, which had been determined to interfere with the osteointegration immediately after surgery; this inconvenience was afterwards solved by the use of a resin splint.

Conclusions

Palatal mini-implants revealed to be clinically easy to use and proved to be an efficient auxiliary device in orthodontics when absolute anchorage is needed.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(07)01492-9

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.651

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 65, Issue 12 , Pages 2492-2497, December 2007