Volume 66, Issue 5 , Pages 900-904, May 2008
Skeletal Stability After Mandibular Setback Surgery: Bicortical Fixation Using a 2.0-mm Locking Plate System Versus Monocortical Fixation Using a Nonlocking Plate System
Purpose
This study was conducted to compare the time-course changes in condylar long-axis and skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with bicortical plate fixation versus monocortical plate fixation.
Patients and Methods
Of a group of 40 Japanese patients diagnosed with mandibular prognathism, 20 underwent SSRO with bicortical plate fixation using a locking plate system and the other 20 underwent SSRO with monocortical plate fixation using a conventional plate system. The time-course changes in condylar long-axis and skeletal stability were assessed through axial, frontal, and lateral cephalograms.
Results
Significant differences were found between the 2 groups in changes of the left condylar angle between the initial and 1-month measurements (P = .0454) and in ANB between the 1- and 3-month measurements (P = .0206); however, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups in the other measurements in each time interval.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest no significant differences in postoperative time-course changes between bicortical plate fixation using a locking plate system and monocortical plate fixation using a conventional plate system.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S0278-2391(07)01890-3
doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.033
© 2008 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 66, Issue 5 , Pages 900-904, May 2008
