Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 66, Issue 2 , Pages 302-307 , February 2008

Vascular Mapping of Head and Neck: Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Digital Subtraction Angiography

  • Manuel Kramer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Fellow, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Kramer: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maxplatz 1, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
    • ,
  • Eleftherios Vairaktaris, MD, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
    • ,
  • Emeka Nkenke, MD, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
    • ,
  • Karl Andreas Schlegel, MD, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
    • ,
  • Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam, MD, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
    • ,
  • Michael Lell, MD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor of Radiology, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

References 

  1. Howaldt HP, Kainz M, Euler B, et al. Proposal for modification of the TNM staging classification for cancer of the oral cavity (DOESAK). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1999;27:275
  2. Kessler P, Grabenbauer G, Leher A, et al. Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (Long-term survival and evaluation of quality of life-initial results obtained with two treatment protocols in a prospective study). Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2004;8:302
  3. Schultze-Mosgau S, Blaese MA, Grabenbauer G, et al. Smad-3 and Smad-7 expression following anti-transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFbeta1)-treatment in irradiated rat tissue. Radiother Oncol. 2004;70:249
  4. Ehrenfeld M, Riediger D, Wolburg H, et al. Angiographic visualization and morphology of anastomosed vessels in microsurgical tissue transplantation. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1987;32:71
  5. Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ, et al. Clinical events following neuroangiography: A prospective study. Stroke. 1987;997
  6. Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Sellar RJ. Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease. Stroke. 1990;209
  7. Davies KN, Humphrey PR. Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia screened by carotid ultrasound. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;967
  8. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: Prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology. 2003;227:522
  9. Nagler RM, Braun J, Daitzman M, et al. Spiral CT angiography: An alternative vascular evaluation technique for head and neck microvascular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:1697
  10. Fleischmann D. Present and future trends in multiple detector-row CT applications: CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(suppl 2):S11
  11. Remy-Jardin M, Tillie-Leblond I, Szapiro D, et al. CT angiography of pulmonary embolism in patients with underlying respiratory disease: Impact of multislice CT on image quality and negative predictive value. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1971
  12. Catalano C, Napoli A, Fraioli F, et al. Multidetector-row CT angiography of the infrarenal aortic and lower extremities arterial disease. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(suppl 5):M88
  13. Herzog C, Dogan S, Wimmer-Greinecker G, et al. Multidetector-row CT: Cardiosurgery indications. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(suppl 5):M82
  14. Klein MB, Karanas YL, Chow LC, et al. Early experience with computed tomographic angiography in microsurgical reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:498
  15. Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Hofmann LK, et al. Multislice CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1946
  16. Marano R, Storto ML, Maddestra N, et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1353
  17. Portugaller HR, Schoellnast H, Hausegger KA, et al. Multislice spiral CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: A valuable tool in detecting significant arterial lumen narrowing?. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1681
  18. Van Ooijen PM, Dorgelo J, Zijlstra F, et al. Detection, visualization and evaluation of anomalous coronary anatomy on 16-slice multidetector-row CT. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:2163
  19. Wiesner W, Hauser A, Steinbrich W. Accuracy of multidetector row computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute bowel ischemia in a nonselected study population. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:2347
  20. Zhang Z, Berg MH, Ikonen AE, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: Reproducibility of automated 3D CT angiography analysis method. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:665
  21. Lell M, Tomandl BF, Anders K, et al. Computed tomography angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in vascular mapping for planning of microsurgical reconstruction of the mandible. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1514
  22. Berman SS, Devine JJ, Erdoes LS, et al. Distinguishing carotid artery pseudo-occlusion with color-flow Doppler. Stroke. 1995;26:434
  23. Nederkoorn PJ, Van der Graaf Y, Hunink MG. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: A systematic review. Stroke. 2003;34:1324
  24. Townsend TC, Saloner D, Pan XM, et al. Contrast material-enhanced MRA overestimates severity of carotid stenosis, compared with 3D time-of-flight MRA. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:36
  25. Barsekow F, Bach-Diesing H, Becker H. Superselective angiography—possibilities and limitations in the preoperative diagnosis of angiomas. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1987;32:66
  26. Buskens E, Nederkoorn PJ, Buijs-Van Der Woude T, et al. Imaging of carotid arteries in symptomatic patients: Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies. Radiology. 2004;233:101
  27. U-King-Im JM, Hollingworth W, Trivedi RA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:506
  28. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: Prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology. 2001;220:179
  29. Hollingworth W, Nathens AB, Kanne JP, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography for traumatic or atherosclerotic lesions of the carotid and vertebral arteries: A systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2003;48:88
  30. Conrad R, Pauleit D, Layer G, et al. Spiral CT of the head-neck area: The advantages of the early arterial phase in the detection of squamous-cell carcinomas. Rofo. 1999;171:15
  31. Keberle M, Tschammler A, Berning K, et al. Spiral CT of the neck: When do neck malignancies delineate best during contrast enhancement?. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1986
  32. Keberle M, Tschammler A, Hahn D. Single-bolus technique for spiral CT of laryngopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Comparison of different contrast material volumes, flow rates and start delays. Radiology. 2002;224:171
  33. Charles M. UNSCEAR report 2000: Sources and effects of ionizing radiation (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). J Radiol Prot. 2001;21:83

PII: S0278-2391(07)01932-5

doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.031

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 66, Issue 2 , Pages 302-307 , February 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution