Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 66, Issue 4 , Pages 639-646, April 2008

Reconstruction of Orbital Wall Defects With Bioactive Glass Plates

  • Matti Peltola, MD, PhD, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor and Clinical Lecturer, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Peltola: Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Turku University Hospital, FI-20521 Turku, Finland
  • ,
  • Ilpo Kinnunen, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Senior in Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • ,
  • Kalle Aitasalo, MD, PhD, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Administrative Chief, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Purpose

Synthetic bioactive glass (BAG) is used in many surgical applications. Special bioactive glasses do not favor microbial growth. This study evaluated the clinical outcome of bioactive glass plates in reconstructive orbital surgery.

Patients and Methods

In a retrospective series of 49 patients, 35 orbital floors and 6 orbital medial and superior walls were reconstructed after fronto-orbital trauma, and 8 patients were treated with BAG plates after fronto-orbital tumor resection. These patients were evaluated in terms of reconstruction materials, complications, and functional outcomes.

Results

During the 2-year follow-up, 3 of the 35 orbital floor trauma reconstructions were reoperated (9%) because of diplopia, and new reconstructions with BAG were performed. In all of the 8 patients with tumors and in 6 of the patients undergoing orbital wall reconstruction, the plates were in the correct position after reconstruction, and none had to be removed. One patient with a benign tumor and 7 of the 8 patients with malignant tumors survived to the 2-year follow-up.

Conclusions

Reconstructive surgery of the orbit is one of the most demanding challenges in head and neck surgery. In orbital defect reconstruction, a BAG plate seems to be a well-tolerated and reliable reconstruction material alternative; however, BAG plates are brittle and rigid, and cannot be molded and shaped by a surgeon. The use of a stainless steel template of equal shape and size to a BAG plate is recommended to ameliorate this deficiency.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(07)02118-0

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.11.019

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 66, Issue 4 , Pages 639-646, April 2008