Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 66, Issue 8 , Pages 1625-1629, August 2008

Predictability of Prebent Advancement Plates for Use in Maxillomandibular Advancement Surgery

  • Kok Weng Lye, BDS, MDS

      Affiliations

    • Fellow, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Lye: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, National Dental Centre, 5 Second Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168938
  • ,
  • Peter D. Waite, MPH, DDS, MD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chairman, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
  • ,
  • Deli Wang, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Medical Statistics Section, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
  • ,
  • Somsak Sittitavornwong, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the predictability when using prebent advancement (PBA) plates in the maxillary osteotomies of maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) surgery.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review of the MMA surgeries at University of Alabama at Birmingham was carried out. Thirty-six obstructive sleep apnea patients who underwent MMA with PBA were included in this study. All cases had fixation of the maxillary osteotomies with KLS Martin PBA titanium plates and screws (KLS Martin, Jacksonville, FL). Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken within 1 month before surgery (T1), and between 2 to 4 weeks postsurgically (T2). All cephalometric radiographs were analyzed using Planmeca Dimaxis Imaging Software (Helsinki, Finland). Vertical and horizontal measurements were made to several skeletal landmarks including Sella (S), A point (APT), and upper incisor (UPI). The amount of advancement was measured through pre- and postoperative lateral cephalographs and compared with the magnitude of the advancement plates used.

Results

All data of 36 patients were included and used for statistics. The data showed that the mean difference was 0.74 mm (advancement is more than the size of the PBA plates) and the mean percentage difference was 11.35%. Fifty percent of the cases had the magnitude of advancement within 1 mm of the PBA size. The predictive analysis found that the PBA size was a significant predictor for the advancement achieved (P < .0001) but not the absolute difference between the advancement achieved and the plate size (P = .0726) and the relative advancement difference (P = .0612). The absolute difference and the relative difference take into account the size of the PBA and are better parameters to judge the predictability of the advancement achieved. The rationale for this unpredictability is largely due to the anatomy of the maxilla and pyriform rims and the adaptation of the PBA to the maxilla.

Conclusion

There are distinct advantages to the use of PBA plates. The PBA plates have been proven to significantly affect the advancement. However, when very precise movements are required, the size of the PBA used does not predictably correlate to and frequently underestimates the amount of advancement achieved. Therefore accurate model surgeries are still required for most cases.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(07)02132-5

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.11.034

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 66, Issue 8 , Pages 1625-1629, August 2008