Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 66, Issue 10 , Pages 2050-2057, October 2008

Conservative Treatment of Oral Ranula by Excision With Minimal Excision of the Sublingual Gland: Histological Support for a Traumatic Etiology

  • Mark McGurk, MD, FRCS, FDSRCSEng

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Consultant in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, England
  • ,
  • Josiah Eyeson, PhD, FDSRCSEng

      Affiliations

    • Lecturer in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, England
  • ,
  • Bethan Thomas, PhD, MFDSRCSEng

      Affiliations

    • Lecturer in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, England
  • ,
  • John D. Harrison, PhD, FDSRCSEng, FRCPath

      Affiliations

    • Reader and Consultant in Oral Pathology, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, England
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Harrison: Department of Oral Pathology, Floor 28, Guy's Tower, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, England

Purpose

This study investigates, clinically and histologically, a new conservative technique for the treatment of oral ranula based on the premise that a discrete unit of the sublingual gland feeds the ranula, which can therefore be treated by local removal with the attached part of the sublingual gland.

Patients and Methods

The study group consisted of 8 patients with ranula treated by decompression of the ranula followed by local surgical removal together with the attached part of the sublingual gland. Detailed histologic examination of the entire specimen was undertaken in every case.

Results

The treatment was successful in all the patients and there have been no recurrences after reviews of from 13 to 29 months (median, 26 months). Histologic examination of the entire specimen showed communication between the removed part of the sublingual gland and the ranula by way of a torn duct in every case.

Conclusions

The premise that the ranula is fed by an attached, discrete unit of the sublingual gland has been vindicated and is the basis for the successful conservative treatment of ranula by decompression and local surgical removal together with the attached part of the sublingual gland. The finding of communication between the attached sublingual gland and ranula in every case indicates a traumatic etiology for these ranulas.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(08)00037-2

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.019

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 66, Issue 10 , Pages 2050-2057, October 2008