Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 3 , Pages 537-542, March 2009

Sensory Action Potentials of the Maxillary Nerve: A Methodologic Study With Clinical Implications

  • Torben H. Thygesen, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Oral Physiology, School of Dentistry, University of Aarhus, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Thygesen: Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
  • ,
  • Lene Baad-Hansen, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Oral Physiology, School of Dentistry, University of Aarhus, Denmark
  • ,
  • Peter Svensson, DDS, PhD, DrOdont

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chairman, Department of Clinical Oral Physiology, School of Dentistry, University of Aarhus, Denmark; Consultant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; and Adjunct Professor, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Denmark

Purpose

Recently, recording of sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) was described and is used as a diagnostic test of traumatic neuropathic trigeminal disorders. The technique is limited to IAN damage; therefore, we adapted the technique to the maxillary nerve, which is also frequently injured by either trauma or orthognathic surgery.

Patients and Methods

Fourteen healthy volunteers participated in this methodologic study in which the infraorbital nerve (ION) was stimulated with 2 needle electrodes. The SNAPs were recorded from the maxillary nerve with a unipolar needle electrode close to the foramen rotundum.

Results

The mean latency of the SNAPs was 0.73 ms (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.85 ms) with a 0.08 ± 0.09 ms interside difference. The mean baseline to peak amplitude was 31.3 ± 7.0 μV (95% CI, 24.2 to 38.3 μV) with a 6.5 ± 32.4 μV interside difference. Repeated tests within a session test demonstrated no significant differences in the latency data (ANOVA: P = .225) or amplitude data (ANOVA: P = .44). Stimulus-response curves indicated that the SNAPs saturated at 5.1 ± 4.4 mA stimulus intensity. In 1 subject, stimulation of the mental nerve elicited SNAPs (latency: 1.6 ms; amplitude 38 μV) in accordance with published values. A local anesthetic block of the ION was associated with a distinct decay of the SNAP in 1 subject.

Conclusion

We suggest that SNAPs of the maxillary nerve can be a valuable technique for a comprehensive examination of the trigeminal system.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(08)00323-6

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.02.015

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 3 , Pages 537-542, March 2009