Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 66, Issue 10 , Pages 2012-2019 , October 2008

A Biomechanical Evaluation of Plating Techniques Used for Reconstructing Mandibular Symphysis/Parasymphysis Fractures

  • Matthew J. Madsen, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
  • ,
  • Christopher A. McDaniel, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Missouri–Kansas City Medical Center, Kansas City, MO
  • ,
  • Richard H. Haug, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Executive Associate Dean, University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, KY
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Haug: College of Dentistry, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street, Room D508, Lexington, KY 40536-0297

References 

  1. Murthy AS, Lehman JA. Symptomatic plate removal in maxillofacial trauma: A review of 76 cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:603
  2. Scolozzi P, Richter M. Treatment of severe mandibular fractures using AO reconstruction plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:458
  3. Schmoker R: The eccentric dynamic-compression plate: An experimental study as to its contribution to the functionally stable internal fixation of fracture of the lower jaw. AO Bull April:1, 1976
  4. Spiessl B. New Concepts in Maxillofacial Bone Surgery. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1976;
  5. Brons R, Boering G. Fractures of the mandibular body treated by stable internal fixation: A preliminary report. J Oral Surg. 1970;28:407
  6. Michelet FX, Deymes J, Dessus B. Osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plates in maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Surg. 1973;1:79
  7. Rudderman RH, Mullen RL. Biomechanics of the facial skeleton. Clin Plast Surg. 1992;19:11
  8. Haug RH, Punjabi AP, Barber E. An in vitro comparison of the effect of number and pattern of positional screws on load resistance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:300
  9. Haug RH, Barber JE, Reifeis R. A comparison of mandibular angle fracture plating techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med, Oral Pathol. 1996;82:257
  10. Haug RH, Fattahi TT, Goltz M. A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular angle fracture plating techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59:1199
  11. Haug RH, Peterson G, Goltz M. A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60:73
  12. Haug RH, Street CC, Goltz M. Does plate adaptation affect stability? (A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates). J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60:1319
  13. Bredbenner TL, Haug RH. Substitutes for human cadaveric bone in maxillofacial rigid fixation research. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90:574
  14. Dichard A, Klotch D. Testing biomechanical strength of repairs for the mandibular angle fracture. Laryngoscope. 1994;104:201
  15. Peterson G, Haug RH, Van Sickels J. A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixation techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1317
  16. Van Sickels J, Peterson G, Holm S, et al. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1620
  17. Madsen M, Haug RH. A biomechanical comparison of two techniques for reconstructing atrophic edentulous mandible fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:457

PII: S0278-2391(08)01051-3

doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.013

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 66, Issue 10 , Pages 2012-2019 , October 2008