Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 4 , Pages 738-743, April 2009

Comparative Study of the Mechanical Resistance of 2 Separate Plates and 2 Overlaid Plates Used in the Fixation of the Mandibular Condyle: An In Vitro Study

  • Walter Cristiano Gealh, DDS

      Affiliations

    • MSc Student, Dental School, State University of Sao Paulo (Julio de Mesouita Filho) UNESP-Arasatuba; and Private Practice, Campo Mourão, Paraná, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Gealh: Goioere Avenue 1119, Campo Mourao, Paraná, Brazil 87302-070
  • ,
  • Julyano Vieira Costa, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
  • ,
  • Geovane Miranda Ferreira, DDS

      Affiliations

    • MSc Student, Dental School, Federal University of Goiás-Goiania; and Private Practice, Goiania, Goiás, Brazil
  • ,
  • Liogi Iwaki Filho, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, State University of Maringá, Paraná, Brazil

Purpose

The objective of this study was to carry out a comparative evaluation of the mechanical resistance of 2 rigid internal fixation techniques for fractures of the mandibular condyle using miniplates.

Materials and Methods

Forty polyurethane resin replicas of human hemimandibles were used. The hemimandibles were sectioned to simulate a high subcondylar fracture and then stabilized with 2 fixing techniques using 2.0-mm system plates and screws. The fixation techniques were 2 separate 4-hole plates with 8 screws, and 2 overlaid 4-hole plates with 4 screws. Each system was submitted to load tests, with the application of the load in mediolateral and anteroposterior directions in an Instron 4411 universal assay machine (Instron, Norwood, MA).

Results

Load values and peak displacement were measured. Means and standard deviations were evaluated by analysis of variance (P < .05) and Tukey tests, in which it was verified that the antero-posterior peak load value was affected by the arrangement of the plates on the models, although no differences were observed between the groups for the mediolateral peak load. The arrangement of the plates did not have any influence on peak displacement. Similarly, the final value of the mediolateral load was not affected by the arrangement of the plates on the model.

Conclusion

The experimental model with 2 separate plates was statistically superior to the model with 2 overlaid plates only in relation to anteroposterior peak load. Despite showing superiority in mediolateral peak load and peak displacement, there was no statistical difference between the groups for these parameters.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(08)01077-X

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.034

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 4 , Pages 738-743, April 2009