Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 2 , Pages 292-300, February 2009

Sensory Testing of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injuries: A Review of Methods Used in Prospective Studies

  • Lucas J. Poort, DDS, MD

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Poort: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kamer D-230, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, s-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • Johan W. van Neck, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Senior Biomedical Scientist, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • Karel G.H. van der Wal, DDS, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Purpose

The inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) can be injured during trauma or surgery. So far there is no consensus for evaluating IAN injury. This study aimed to identify a testing method suitable for daily clinical practice which allows us to identify nerve injury, grade its severity, and monitor its recovery.

Materials and Methods

Covering a 20-year period, prospective studies on sensory changes after mandibular procedures were reviewed regarding sensory testing methods; 75 studies on third molar removal, osteotomy, fracture, and implants were included.

Results

These studies reported varying incidences. In third molar removal and implant studies, a limited number of sensory tests were used, whereas in osteotomy and fracture studies more detailed testing was performed, using reproducible tests like light touch test with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and 2-point discrimination.

Conclusions

Sensory function was not uniformly tested and presented, making a comparison of data impossible and highlighting the need for uniform testing methodology. Based on the results of this review, the light touch test with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for grading is recommended, using a grid and control site describing unilateral or bilateral nerve injury. Additionally, a visual analog scale-based questionnaire should be used to evaluate subjective sensibility. Using this method to test IAN injuries will allow comparison of future studies and provide valuable insight in the severity and prognosis of IAN injuries.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(08)01137-3

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.076

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 2 , Pages 292-300, February 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution