Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 4 , Pages 760-766, April 2009

Surgical Repositioning of the Premaxilla With Bone Graft in 50 Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

  • João L. Carlini, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Maxillofacial Surgeon, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Center for Integral Assistance of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
  • ,
  • Cassia Biron, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Maxillofacial Surgeon, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Center for Integral Assistance of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
  • ,
  • Kelston Ulbricht Gomes, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Maxillofacial Surgeon, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Center for Integral Assistance of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Gomes: Bruno Filgueira Street, 369, Conjunto 1402, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
  • ,
  • Rafael M. Da Silva, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Maxillofacial Surgeon, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Center for Integral Assistance of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate a modified surgical technique for premaxilla repositioning with concomitant autogenous bone grafting in bilateral trans-foramen cleft lip and palate patients.

Patients and Methods

The study included 50 bilateral trans-foramen cleft lip and palate patients. Bone graft was harvested from the mandibular symphysis in 24 patients. Whenever more grafting was necessary, the iliac crest bone was used as the donor site (26 patients). The premaxilla was displaced by rupturing the bone and the palatine mucosa, and repositioned in a more adequate position using a surgical guide. The premaxilla and the grafts were fixed with miniplates and screws or screws only. The surgical guide was kept in place for 2 months, whereas the miniplates and screws were removed after 6 months, together with the complete bilateral lip and nose repair. Follow-up examinations were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months by means of periapical and occlusal radiographs, and by clinical examination. Thereafter, the patients were referred for completion of the orthodontic treatment.

Results

Overall, in 48 cases (96%) the treatment achieved total graft integration, with complete closure of the bucconasal and palatal fistulas, and premaxilla stability (either at first surgery or after reoperation). In the remaining 2 patients (4%), the treatment failed, due to necrosis of the premaxilla.

Conclusions

The procedure is complex and involves risk. However, the patient's social inclusion, especially at the addressed age group, is the best benefit achieved.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(08)01243-3

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.07.013

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 4 , Pages 760-766, April 2009