Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 3 , Pages 477-484, March 2009

Does Congenital Cleft Palate Intrinsically Influence Craniofacial Morphology?: Craniofacial Features in Unoperated Submucous Cleft Palate Children in Prepuberty

  • Hiroshi Iwasaki, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Dental Clinical Division, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Iwasaki: Department of Orthodontics, Dental Clinical Division, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido University, Kita 14-jo Nishi 5-chome, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan
  • ,
  • Motonori Kudo, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Lecturer, Division for General Dentistry, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
  • ,
  • Yuko Yamamoto, SLHTs

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Speech Clinic, Dental Clinical Division, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

Purpose

The aberrations in facial structure with concave midface are a well-recognized feature characterizing cleft palate patients. Several explanations have been given as to the aberration causes, including surgical interference or the primary tissue deficiency in the congenital cleft. The aim of this study was to determine intrinsic effects of congenital cleft palate on craniofacial morphology by retrospectively comparing craniofacial features between children with unoperated submucous cleft palate and noncleft children with normal occlusion in prepuberty.

Patients and Methods

Twelve Japanese children (7 girls and 5 boys) with unoperated submucous cleft palate at age 9 were examined cephalometrically. None of them had undergone any orthodontic treatments. Their craniofacial morphologies were compared with those in 60 Japanese noncleft children (30 girls and 30 boys) with normal occlusion at age 9.

Results

In cleft children, anteroposterior length of the maxilla was significantly short, and the posterior part of the maxilla was more in the anterior position compared with noncleft children. Also, the anterior parts of the maxilla tended to be slightly retruded in cleft children.

Conclusion

In the current study, we recognized characteristic differences in the craniofacial morphology between the unoperated submucous cleft palate children and the noncleft children in prepuberty, and showed that the craniofacial deviation in the cleft children can be defined as the intrinsic effects of congenital cleft palate itself.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(08)01391-8

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.008

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 3 , Pages 477-484, March 2009