Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 3 , Pages 602-607 , March 2009

Histomorphometric Evaluation of Alumina-Blasted/Acid-Etched and Thin Ion Beam-Deposited Bioceramic Surfaces: An Experimental Study in Dogs

  • Marcelo Suzuki, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Marcia V.M. Guimaraes, DDS, MSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Instructor, Department of Implant Dentistry, Escola de Aperfeicoamento Profissional (EAP), São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Charles Marin, DDS, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Instructor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • ,
  • Rodrigo Granato, DDS, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Instructor, Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil
  • ,
  • José Nazareno Gil, DDS, MSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil
  • ,
  • Paulo G. Coelho, DDS, MS, MSMtE, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Coelho: 345 24th Street, Room 804, New York, NY 10010

References 

  1. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants (Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man). Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:155
  2. Brånemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:399
  3. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lindhe J. Bone reactions to long-standing functional load at implants: An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:925
  4. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1—Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:536
  5. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2—Review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:544
  6. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res. 2004;83:529
  7. Butz F, Aita H, Wang CJ, et al. Harder and stiffer bone osseointegrated to roughened titanium. J Dent Res. 2006;85:560
  8. deGroot KKC, Wolke JGC, deBieck-Hogervorst JM. Plasma-sprayed coating of calcium phosphate. In:  Yamamuro THL,  Wilson J editor. Handbook of Bioactive Ceramics, Vol II (Calcium Phosphate and Hydroxyapatite Ceramics). Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1990;p. 17–25
  9. Lacefield WR. Current status of ceramic coatings for dental implants. Implant Dent. 1998;7:315
  10. Lemons JE. Biomaterials, biomechanics, tissue healing, and immediate-function dental implants. J Oral Implantol. 2004;30:318
  11. Ong JL, Carnes DL, Bessho K. Evaluation of titanium plasma-sprayed and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite implants in vivo. Biomaterials. 2004;25:4601
  12. Park YS, Yi KY, Lee IS, et al. The effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the grit-blasted surface of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:31
  13. Kay J. Calcium phosphate coatings for dental implants. Dent Clin North Am. 1992;36:1
  14. Lacefield WR. Hydroxyapatite coatings. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;523:72
  15. Lemons J, Dietch-Misch F. Biomaterials for dental implants. In:  Misch CE editors. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. Saint Louis: Mosby; 1999;p. 271–302
  16. Yang Y, Kim KH, Ong JL. A review on calcium phosphate coatings produced using a sputtering process—An alternative to plasma spraying. Biomaterials. 2005;26:327
  17. Coelho PG, Lemons JE: IBAD Nanothick bioceramic incorporation on metallic implants for bone healing enhancement, in Nanoscience Technology and Science Institute (ed): Physico/Chemical Characterization to In Vivo Performance Evaluation. Anaheim, CA, 2005, pp 316-319
  18. Orsini G, Piatelli M, Scarano A, et al. Randomized, controlled histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of implants with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate added to the dual acid-etched surface in the human posterior maxilla. J Periodontol. 2006;77:1984
  19. Burgess AV, Story BJ, Wagner WR, et al. Highly crystalline MP-1 hydroxylapatite coating (Part II: In vivo performance on endosseous root implants in dogs). Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:257
  20. Coelho PG, Suzuki M. Evaluation of an IBAD thin-film process as an alternative method for surface incorporation of bioceramics on dental implants (A study in dogs). J Appl Oral Science. 2005;13:87
  21. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4748
  22. Coelho PG, Freire JNO, Coelho AL, et al. Nanothickness Bioceramic Coatings: Improving the Host Response to Surgical Implants. In: Munich, Germany: Medimont; 2006;p. 253–258
  23. Ong JL, Bessho K, Carnes DL. Bone response to plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite and radiofrequency-sputtered calcium phosphate implants in vivo. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:581
  24. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues (The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique). J Oral Pathol. 1982;11:318
  25. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, et al. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:251
  26. Ogawa T, Ozawa S, Shih JH, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of osseous implants having different surface topographies in rats. J Dent Res. 2000;79:1857
  27. Furlong RJ, Osborn JF. Fixation of hip prostheses by hydroxyapatite ceramic coatings. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:741
  28. LeGeros RZ. Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: Calcium phosphates. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;395:81
  29. Coelho PG, Suzuki M. Evaluation of an IBAD thin-film process as an alternative method for surface incorporation of bioceramics on dental implants (A study in dogs). J Appl Oral Science. 2005;13:87
  30. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4748
  31. Coelho PG, Lemons JE. Physico/chemical characterization and in vivo evaluation of nanothickness bioceramic depositions on alumina-blasted/acid-etched Ti-6Al-4V implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;[Epub ahead of print]
  32. Coelho PG, Cardaropoli G, Suzuki M, et al. Early healing of nanothickness bioceramic coatings on dental implants (An experimental study in dogs). J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;[Epub ahead of print]
  33. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw (Experience from a 10-year period). Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1

PII: S0278-2391(08)01406-7

doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.021

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 3 , Pages 602-607 , March 2009