Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 4 , Pages 751-759, April 2009

Accuracy of Computer Programs in Predicting Orthognathic Surgery Soft Tissue Response

  • Neelambar R. Kaipatur, DMD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • Carlos Flores-Mir, DDS, DSc, FRCD(C)

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Orthodontic Graduate Program, Department of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Flores-Mir: Dentistry/Pharmacy Centre, Orthodontic Graduate Program, Room 4051, Director Cranio-facial & Oral-Health Evidence-Based Practice Group, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2N8, Canada

Purpose

The aim of the present systematic review is to investigate the accuracy of computer programs in predicting soft tissue response subsequent to skeletal changes after orthognathic surgery.

Materials and Methods

A systematic computerized database search was conducted using Ovid Medline, Ovid Medline in-process and other nonindexed citations, all EBM reviews (including Cochrane DSR, ACP Journal, DARE, CCTR), Embase Experta Medica, Pascal, and Thomsen's ISI Web of Science databases. The terms orthognathic surgery, orthodontic treatment, computer prediction, computer simulation, growth prediction, accuracy, precision, forecast, and human studies were used for the searches. The reference lists of all the selected articles were also searched for any potential articles that might have been missed in the electronic search of the database, and additional information not available through the articles was obtained directly from the source (by contacting the author).

Results

Out of the 40 initially identified articles only 7 articles fulfilled the final selection criteria. All 7 studies in general showed accurate prediction outcomes (less than 2 mm) when compared with actual results in both horizontal and vertical directions. From all the available computer prediction programs Quick Ceph, DentoFacial Planner (DFP), and Computer-Assisted Simulation System for Orthognathic Surgery (CASSOS) were the most frequently used.

Conclusions

The most significant area of error in prediction through the available computer prediction programs was the lower lip area. Although the individual errors are almost always minimal (less than 2 mm), the composite addition of these minimal errors could have clinical implications.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr Flores-Mir is supported by the 2007 American Association Orthodontists Foundation–Eugene E. West Memorial Fellowship Award.

PII: S0278-2391(08)01722-9

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.006

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 4 , Pages 751-759, April 2009