Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 11 , Pages 2404-2411, November 2009

Degrees of Tolerance in Post-Traumatic Orbital Volume Correction: The Role of Prefabricated Mesh

  • Patricio Andrades, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Daniel Hernandez, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Maria Isabel Falguera, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Jose Maria Millan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Susana Heredero, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Ramon Gutierrez, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Gregorio Sánchez-Aniceto, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor of Surgery and Vice Director, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Sánchez-Aniceto: Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Av Cordoba s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain

Purpose

To identify factors influencing the volumetric correction of orbital fractures, and evaluate the use of prefabricated titanium mesh in their repair.

Materials and Methods

We included patients with unilateral orbital fractures and floor or medial-wall defects, subsequently reconstructed with titanium mesh, and subject to adequate follow-up with multislice, digitalized computed tomography (CT) images. Medical records were reviewed, and demographics, operative details, and postoperative course were recorded as prognostic variables. Moreover, orbital volume, apex-to-globe distance, and orbital rim area were measured using postoperative CT. Univariate analysis and a multiple-regression model were used to identify associated factors.

Results

A total of 32 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Postoperative clinical evaluation and CT images were obtained in a mean ± SD of 12.3 ± 7.2 months after surgery. Clinically, 20 patients were considered normal (63%), and 12 manifested some ocular dystopia (37%). On postoperative CT, the mesh was in good position in 44% of cases, and in an insufficient position in 56% of cases. There was a significant difference between fractured and normal orbits in relation to orbital volume and apex-globe distance. Clinical evaluation significantly correlated with CT mesh placement, but there was no correlation between clinical evaluation and any of the variables measured on CT. The most important factors influencing postoperative orbital volume correction were type of fracture, affected walls, and use of prefabricated mesh.

Conclusion

Volumetric and lineal symmetry between fractured and normal orbits are very difficult to achieve. In this study, postoperative CT measurements did not correlate with subjective clinical assessment. The clinical-radiological disagreement may be explained by measurement accuracy problems, clinical bias, or normal differences between orbits. The most important identified modifiable factor was the use of prefabricated mesh.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No author had financial interests or commercial associations that posed or created a conflict of interest in this study.

PII: S0278-2391(09)00063-9

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.024

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 11 , Pages 2404-2411, November 2009