Logo
Search for

Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 254-259 (February 2010)


View previous. 9 of 54 View next.

Skeletal and Dental Stability After Maxillary Distraction With a Rigid External Device in Adult Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

Muge Aksu, DDS, PhDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Banu Saglam-Aydinatay, DDS, PhD, Cenk Ahmet Akcan, DDS, PhD, Hakan El, DDS, PhD§, Tulin Taner, DDS, PhD, Ilken Kocadereli, DDS, PhD, Gokhan Tuncbilek, MD, PhD#, Mehmet Emin Mavili, MD⁎⁎

Purpose

To evaluate skeletal and dental stability in adult cleft lip and palate patients treated with a rigid external distraction system at the end of distraction and during the postdistraction period.

Patients and Methods

Lateral cephalograms of 7 patients were obtained before distraction, at the end of distraction, and during the postdistraction period. The mean age before distraction was 21.56 ± 4.73 years. The mean follow-up was 37.3 ± 12.4 months.

Results

The assessment of findings showed that skeletal maxillary sagittal movement was achieved in a superoanterior direction. The maxillary depth angle and effective maxillary length increased significantly (2° and 9 mm, respectively) after distraction, whereas the palatal plane angle increased by 8°, resulting in an anterior movement of the maxilla with a counterclockwise rotation. The lower facial height showed no significant changes after distraction. The sagittal movement of the upper incisors and the angulation of the upper first molars increased significantly (4.5 mm and 5.5°, respectively). During the postdistraction period, the maxilla showed a slight relapse (22%). The effective maxillary length decreased by 2 mm. The palatal plane angle almost returned to its original position, showing 7° of clockwise rotation. The lower facial height remained stable. The upper incisors moved anteriorly and the upper first molars showed a significant mesioangular change during follow-up.

Conclusions

After distraction, significant maxillary advancement was achieved with a counterclockwise rotation. The upper incisors moved labially, and the upper first molars angulated mesially. After 3 years, a 22% relapse rate was seen in the maxilla. The counterclockwise rotation of the maxilla was returned to its original position. The upper incisors moved more anteriorly.

 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

 Instructor, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

§ Instructor, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

 Professor, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

 Professor and Head, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

# Associate Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Esthetic Surgery, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

⁎⁎ Professor and Head, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Esthetic Surgery, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Aksu: Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye 06100, Ankara, Turkey

PII: S0278-2391(09)00355-3

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.030


View previous. 9 of 54 View next.