Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 8 , Pages 1628-1639, August 2009

Accuracy of Computer Programs in Predicting Orthognathic Surgery Hard Tissue Response

  • Neelambar Kaipatur, DMD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • PhD Candidate, Graduate Orthodontic Program, Department of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • Yousef Al-Thomali, BDS, Cert Ortho

      Affiliations

    • Senior Registrar Orthodontist, Prince Mansour Military Hospital, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • ,
  • Carlos Flores-Mir, DDS, DSc, FRCD(C)

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Graduate Orthodontic Program, Department of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Flores-Mir: Department of Dentistry, University of Alberta, 4051A Dentistry/Pharmacy Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2N8

Purpose

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the accuracy of computer programs in predicting skeletal changes after orthognathic surgery.

Materials and Methods

A systematic computerized database search was conducted with the help of a health sciences librarian. Specific selection criteria were used to select articles, reference lists of the selected articles were also searched for any potential articles that might have been missed in the electronic search, and additional information not available through the articles was obtained directly from the corresponding author.

Results

Of the 79 initially identified articles (abstracts/titles), only 9 fulfilled the final selection criteria. As expected, no dental changes occurred but the computer programs were unable to precisely predict all the skeletal changes. Most of the prediction inaccuracies were within 2 mm or 2°, which can be partially attributed to measurement errors in cephalometric tracing.

Conclusions

This systematic review showed that computer programs cannot consistently predict the skeletal changes occurring after orthognathic surgery but their results may be considered inside a clinically acceptable range. Last-minute changes by the surgeons could also explain the differences. We also conclude that no software program was shown to be superior in prediction accuracy compared with its competitor.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr Flores-Mir is supported by an American Association of Orthodontics Foundation teaching award (2007 Eugene E. West Memorial Fellowship Award).

PII: S0278-2391(09)00375-9

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.040

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 8 , Pages 1628-1639, August 2009