Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 12 , Pages 2617-2626 , December 2009

Replacement of the Condyle and Ascending Ramus by a Modular Endoprosthesis in Macaca fascicularis—Part 2: Microcomputed Tomographic and Histologic Evaluation of the Ramus and Stem

  • Bee Tin Goh, BDS, MDS, FDS RCS, FAMS

      Affiliations

    • Senior Consultant, National Dental Centre, Singapore, Singapore
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Goh: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, National Dental Centre, 5 Second Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168938 Singapore
    • ,
  • Shermin Lee, BDS, MDS, FRACDS

      Affiliations

    • Registrar, National Dental Centre, Singapore, Singapore
    • ,
  • Henk Tideman, MD, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Emeritus Professor, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China; Research Advisor and Visiting Consultant, National Dental Centre, Singapore, Singapore; Professor, Prince of Songkhla University, Hat Yai, Thailand; and Advisor, Tideman Maxillofacial Centre, Hong Kong
    • ,
  • John A. Jansen, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chairman, Department of Periodontology and Biomaterials, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • Paul J.W. Stoelinga, MD, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Emeritus Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and Emeritus Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

References 

  1. Tideman H, Lee S. The TL endoprosthesis for mandibular reconstruction—A metallic yet biological approach. Asian J Oral Maxfac Surg. 2006;18:5
  2. Lee S, Goh BT, Tideman H, et al. Modular endoprosthesis for mandibular reconstruction: A preliminary animal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:40
  3. Goh BT, Lee S, Tideman H, et al. Replacement of the condyle and ascending ramus by a modular endoprosthesis in Macaca fascicularis (Part 1: A clinical and radiographic study). J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:1392
  4. Charnley J. The bonding of prostheses to bone by cement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1964;46B:518
  5. Croci AT, Camargo OP, Baptista AM, et al. The use of a modular titanium endoprosthesis in skeletal reconstructions after bone tumour resections: Method presentation and analysis of 37 cases. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2000;55:169
  6. Henshaw R, Malawer M. Treatment of sarcomas and allied diseases: Review of endoprosthetic reconstruction in limb-sparing surgery. In:  Malawer M,  Sugarbaker PH editor. Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001;p. 381–401
  7. Quinn PD. Lorenz prosthesis. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2000;12:93
  8. Mercuri LG, Wolford LM, Sanders B, et al. Custom CAD/CAM total temporomandibular joint reconstruction system: Preliminary multicenter report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53:106
  9. Kim MR, Donoff RB. Critical analysis of mandibular reconstruction using AO reconstruction plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:1152
  10. Spencer KR, Sizeland A, Taylor GI, et al. The use of titanium mandibular reconstruction plates in patients with oral cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;28:288
  11. Dechow PC, Hylander WL. Elastic properties and masticatory bone stress in the macaque mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000;112:553
  12. Markwardt J, Pfeifer G, Eckelt U, et al. Analysis of complications after reconstruction of bone defects involving complete mandibular resection using finite element modeling. Onkologie. 2007;30:121
  13. Wodajo FM, Bickels J, Wittig J, et al. Complex reconstruction in the management of extremity sarcomas. Curr Opin Oncol. 2003;15:304
  14. Jansen JA, Dhert WJA, Van der Waerden JPCM, et al. Semi-quantitative and qualitative histologic analysis method for the evaluation of implant biocompatibility. J Invest Surg. 1994;7:123
  15. Harris WH. Periprosthetic osteolysis around total hips and total knees. In:  Shanbhag A,  Rubash HE,  Jacobs JJ editor. Joint Replacement and Bone Resorption. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2006;p. 1–11
  16. Callaghan JJ, Templeton JE, Liu SS, et al. Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years: A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86A:690
  17. Jasty MJ, Floyd WE, Schiller AL, et al. Localised osteolysis in stable, non-septic total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:912
  18. Massin P, Chappard D, Flautre B, et al. Migration of polyethylene particles around nonloosened cemented femoral components from a total hip arthroplasty—An autopsy study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;69:205
  19. Mohler CG, Callaghan JJ, Collis DK, et al. Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis interface after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1315
  20. Aspenberg P, Van der Vis H. Migration, particles and fluid pressure: A discussion of causes of prosthetic loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;352:75
  21. Manley MT, D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, et al. Osteolysis: A disease of access to fixation interfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:129
  22. Ryd L. Micromotion in knee arthroplasty: A roentgen stereophotogrametric analysis of tibial component fixation. Acta Orthop Scand. 1986;220:1
  23. Cameron HU. The implant–bone interface. In:  Cameron HU editors. Bone Implant Interface. St Louis: Mosby; 1994;p. 145–168
  24. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. Acrylic cement creeps but does not allow much subsidence of femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79B:665
  25. Charnley J. The reaction of bone to self-curing acrylic cement: A long-term histological study in man. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1970;52:340
  26. Draenert KRJ. Histomorphologie des Knochen-Zement Kontaktes. E. Eine Tierexperimentelle Phanomenologie der knochernen Umbauvorgange. 1978;49:279
  27. Linder L, Hansson HA. Ultrastructural aspects of the interface between bone and cement in man (Report of three cases). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983;65:646
  28. Malcome AJ. Pathology of cemented low-friction arthroplasties in autopsy specimens. In:  Older J editors. Implant Bone Interface. London: Springer-Verlag; 1990;p. 77–82
  29. Ulmansky M, Bab I, Kaznelson D. Primary mineralization in the interface between bone and methyl methacrylate implants in rat mandibles: A correlative light and scanning and transmission electron microscope study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1983;101:171
  30. Bobyn JD, Tanzer M, Miller JE. Fundamental principles of biologic fixation. In:  Morrey BF editors. Reconstructive Surgery of the Joints. (ed 2). New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1996;p. 75–94
  31. Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C. Observation on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous surfaced implants. Clin Orthop. 1986;208:108
  32. Chan K-H, Ahmed AM, Johnson JA. Polymethacrylate. In:  Morrey BF editors. Reconstructive Surgery of the Joints. (ed 2). New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1996;p. 29–43
  33. Ryd L, Linder L. On the correlation between micromotion and histology of the bone-cement interface: Report of three cases of knee arthroplasty followed by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Arthroplasty. 1989;4:303
  34. Kay CN, Scapino RP, Kay ED. A cinephotographic study of the role of the canine in limiting lateral jaw movement in Macaca fascicularis. J Dent Res. 1986;65:1300

 This study was supported by grants from the National Medical Research Council/National Dental Centre (grant NMRC/EG/NDC/2005/06/supplementary) and Singhealth Foundation (grant SHF/SP001/2007).

PII: S0278-2391(09)00573-4

doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.073

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 12 , Pages 2617-2626 , December 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution