Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 11, Supplement , Pages 13-22 , November 2009

Computed Tomography–Guided Surgery: Complications Associated With Scanning, Processing, Surgery, and Prosthetics

  • Michael S. Block, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Metairie, LA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Block: 110 Veterans Memorial Blvd, Suite 112, Metairie, LA 70005
    • ,
  • Clay Chandler, DDS, MD

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Louisiana State University School of Dentistry, New Orleans, LA

References 

  1. Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Naert I, et al. Predictability of reformatted computed tomography for pre-operative planning of endosseous implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999;28:37
  2. Lal K, White G, Morea D, et al. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I (The concept). J Prosthodont. 2006;15:51
  3. Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 2006;26:239
  4. Stumpfel L. Guided surgery, errors and planning, Academy of Osseointegration annual meeting, San Diego. February 2009;
  5. Komiyama A, Klinge B, Hultin M. Treatment outcome of immediately loaded implants installed in edentulous jaws following computer-assisted virtual treatment planning, and flapless surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:677
  6. Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, et al. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:394
  7. Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery—A review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:305
  8. Allum SR. Immediately loaded full-arch provisional implant restorations using CAD/CAM and guided placement: Maxillary and mandibular case reports. Br Dent J. April 2008;204:377
  9. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, et al. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:228
  10. Veyre-Goulet S, Fortin T, Thierry A. Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: A human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008;10:226
  11. Van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Andersson M, et al. A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:663
  12. Van Assche N, Van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, et al. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-demensional cone-beam images: A pilot study. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34:816
  13. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:571
  14. Besimo CE, Lambrecht JT, Guindy JS. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000;29:46
  15. Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, et al. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: Clinical data from 94 implants. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1339
  16. Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, et al. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: Preliminary results. J Periodontol. 2005;76:503
  17. Bedrossian E. Laboratory and prosthetic considerations in computer-guided surgery and immediate loading. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(suppl 1):47
  18. Fortin T, Bosson JL, Coudert JL, et al. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system of oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: An in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:886
  19. Nickenig HJ, Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg. 2007;35:207
  20. Scarano A, Carinci F, Quaranta A, et al. Effects of bur wear during implant site preparation: An in vitro study. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2007;20(suppl):23
  21. Yong LT, Moy P. Complications of computer-aided-design/computer-aided-machining-guided (NobelGuide) surgical implant placement: An evaluation of early clinical results. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008;10:123
  22. Hiroyuki T, Eiichi H, Tooru K, et al. Study of clinical validity on helical CT and limited cone-beam CT (3DX CT) for tooth length measurement. J Orthod Waves. 2004;63:78
  23. Nkenke E, Eitner S, Radespiel-Troger M, et al. Patient-centered outcomes comparing transmucosal implant placement with an open approach in the maxilla: A prospective, non-randomized pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:197
  24. Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: A position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;89:630

 Drs Block and Chandler state no financial arrangement or affiliation with a corporate organization or a manufacturer of a product discussed in this article.

PII: S0278-2391(09)00583-7

doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.082

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 11, Supplement , Pages 13-22 , November 2009

Article Tools