Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 12 , Pages 2605-2608, December 2009

Stereologic Orbital Volume Measurements in Zygomatic Fractures

This study was partially presented at the 28th National Turkish Plastic, Reconstructive, and Esthetic Surgery Congress, 2006, Ankara, Turkey.

  • İrfan Özyazgan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Esthetic Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Özyazgan: Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Esthetic Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Melikgazi, Kayseri 38039 Turkey
  • ,
  • Nuri Erdoğan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
  • ,
  • Bunyamin Sahin, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of stereologic methods to measure the orbital volume using computed tomography images of patients with zygomatic fractures.

Materials and Methods

The present study was retrospectively conducted using hard-copy computed tomography images acquired during the postoperative period of 22 patients with unilateral zygomatic fractures. Orbital volume measurements were performed on the surgically treated and contralateral normal orbits using stereologic methods. The estimates obtained from both sides were compared statistically using the paired samples t test. The measurements were repeated by 2 different observers to estimate the interobserver variability.

Results

When both observers were taken into account, the mean volume in the normal and surgically treated orbits was 23.6 ± 3.2 and 24.4 ± 3.1 cm3, respectively. A statistically significant difference was noted between the surgically treated and normal orbits (P < .05). The volumes of 16 treated orbits were enlarged by 5.8% ± 3.8% and 6 were diminished by 2.7% ± 1.4%. A very high statistical correlation was noted between the 2 observers (R > .95). The total time consumed for calculation in each patient (2 orbits) was 9 to 12 minutes.

Conclusions

Stereologic estimation of the orbital volume is an easy, practical, and time-saving procedure that can be performed on readily available, hard-copy computed tomography images. The high interobserver agreement observed in our study shows that it can be safely used in the quantitative detection of preoperative and postoperative volume changes.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(09)00591-6

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.087

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 12 , Pages 2605-2608, December 2009