Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 11 , Pages 2323-2331, November 2009

Effect of a Syndromic Diagnosis on Mandibular Size and Sagittal Position in Robin Sequence

  • Gary Rogers, MD, JD, MBA, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor of Surgery, Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Asher A.T. Lim, BDS, MDS

      Affiliations

    • Fellow, Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • John B. Mulliken, MD

      Affiliations

    • Professor of Surgery, Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Bonnie L. Padwa, DMD, MD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Padwa: Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115

Purpose

Despite its pathogenic heterogeneity, it is often assumed that the small mandible in a neonate with Robin sequence will not grow normally. The purpose of this study was to determine mandibular length and position in patients with nonsyndromic versus syndromic Robin sequence.

Patients and Methods

Lateral cephalograms of 51 children with Robin sequence were analyzed. Group I consisted of nonsyndromic (NS) subjects and group II consisted of subjects with the 4 most common syndromic (S) diagnoses. Cephalometric measurements included sella-nasion-A point (SNA), sella-nasion-B point (SNB), sella-nasion-pogonion (SNPg), articulare-gonion-pogonion (ArGoPg), temporomandibular joint-pogonion (TmPg), articulare-gonion (ArGo), and gonion-pogonion (GoPg). Differences between groups and subgroups were compared using t test.

Results

There were 26 NS patients (mean age, 6.8 yrs) and 25 S patients (mean age, 8.7 yrs); mean age was statistically different between groups (P = .04); therefore, cephalometric measurements were compared with age-matched normal values. Syndromes included Stickler (n = 10), bilateral facial microsomia (n = 8), velocardiofacial (n = 4), and Treacher Collins (n = 3). SNA was statistically different from normal in both groups (NS, P = .017; S, P = .007); however, SNB was not different from normal for either group (NS, P = .175; S, P = .537). SNPg (0.007) was significantly greater than normal in NS (P = .007) but not in S (P = .702) patients. SNA, SNB, and SNPg were not significantly different between groups. In both groups, mandibular length was short (P = .00), especially in S patients (P = .049), mandibular body was small (NS, P = .00; S, P = .00), and the gonial angle more obtuse (NS, P = .006; S, P = .000) than normal. Ramus length was significantly shorter than normal only in S patients (P = .019). Mandibular length (TmPg) was smaller than normal in all S subgroups but with wide variability. There were statistically significant differences among S subgroups with respect to mandibular sagittal position (SNB, P = .00; SNPg, P = .00) and mandibular length (TmPg, P = .008). There were no differences in S subgroups with respect to age, SNA, ArGo, GoPg, and ArGoPg.

Conclusion

Mandibular morphology and position are variable in Robin sequence, based on the presence and type of associated syndromic diagnosis.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(09)01330-5

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.06.010

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum

    Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery December 2009 (Vol. 67, Issue 12, Page 2703)

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 67, Issue 11 , Pages 2323-2331, November 2009