Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 68, Issue 3 , Pages 515-523, March 2010

Effect of Zoledronic Acid on Osseointegration of Titanium Implants: An Experimental Study in an Ovariectomized Rabbit Model

  • Alper Yıldız, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Assistant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Yildiz: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Çukurova University Faculty of Dentistry, Balcali, Adana, Turkey
  • ,
  • Emin Esen, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mehmet Kürkçü, DDS, MSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
  • ,
  • İbrahim Damlar, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Research Assistant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
  • ,
  • Kenan Dağlıoğlu, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Veterinary Surgeon, The Experimental Surgery Center, School of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
  • ,
  • Tolga Akova, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey

Purpose

Zoledronic acid (ZA), a new-generation intravenous bisphosphonate, exhibits the greatest affinity for bone mineral with the longest retention, thereby leading to its ability to be dosed at annual intervals in the treatment of osteoporosis. The purpose of this preliminary study was to evaluate the effects of systemic administration of a single dose of ZA on osseointegration and bone healing around titanium dental implants.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-six female New Zealand rabbits (aged 6-12 months) were used in this study. Rabbits were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: sham control group (SH), ovariectomy group (OVX), and OVX and ZA group (OVX + ZA). Animals in the OVX and OVX + ZA groups were subjected to bilateral ovariectomy, whereas animals in the SH group were sham operated. Eight weeks later, 1 implant was placed in each tibia of the animals. ZA was administered in the OVX + ZA group during the implantation, whereas the OVX and SH groups received saline solution infusions. All of the subjects were sacrificed 8 weeks after the implantation, and tibial specimens were harvested. Histomorphometric bone-to-implant contact analysis, resonance frequency analysis, removal torque testing, and digital radiographic absorptiometry were administered, and the data were statistically analyzed.

Results

Histomorphometric, resonance frequency, and radiodensitometric analyses showed significant improvement in osseointegration of implants in the OVX + ZA group compared with the OVX group. However, the differences in removal torque results between the groups were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that systemic ZA administration may improve osseointegration of titanium implants placed in estrogen-deficient states of bone.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was partially supported by the Çukurova University scientific research fund and BioLok International and its representative in Turkey (UMG Uysal Medikal).

PII: S0278-2391(09)01478-5

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.066

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 68, Issue 3 , Pages 515-523, March 2010